Source-linked AI summary

Adaptive Subcarrier PSK Intensity Modulation in Free Space Optical Systems

Nestor D. Chatzidiamantis, Athanasios S. Lioumpas, George K. Karagiannidis, Shlomi Arnon

arXiv:1002.1897v1cs.NI

TL;DR

Atmospheric turbulence causes received-intensity fluctuations that threaten FSO reliability and communication rate. The paper adapts S-PSK modulation order to instantaneous fading and a BER target; it reports spectral-efficiency gains in moderate-to-strong turbulence while maintaining the BER target, with additional MIMO gains as apertures increase.

  • Problem

    Atmospheric turbulence causes rapid intensity fluctuations that can severely affect FSO-link reliability and communication rate.

    Source: §I · p. 2
  • Method

    The scheme adapts S-PSK modulation order to instantaneous fading and a predefined BER requirement, then applies the policy to MIMO FSO systems.

    Source: §I · p. 3
  • Results

    14 dB spectral-efficiency gain over non-adaptive modulation at S = 0.5, Po = 10^-3, and σx = 0.5; average BER remains below its target in examined cases.

    Source: §IV · p. 11, §V · p. 12
  • Takeaways & Limitations

    In moderate-to-strong turbulence, adaptive transmission improves spectral efficiency, and increasing transmit and/or receive apertures further improves it except below 8 dB average SNR.

    Source: §IV · p. 11, §V · p. 12

Abstract

from arXiv · show

We propose an adaptive transmission technique for free space optical (FSO) systems, operating in atmospheric turbulence and employing subcarrier phase shift keying (S-PSK) intensity modulation. Exploiting the constant envelope characteristics of S-PSK, the proposed technique offers efficient utilization of the FSO channel capacity by adapting the modulation order of S-PSK, according to the instantaneous state of turbulence induced fading and a pre-defined bit error rate (BER) requirement. Novel expressions for the spectral efficiency and average BER of the proposed adaptive FSO system are presented and performance investigations under various turbulence conditions and target BER requirements are carried out. Numerical results indicate that significant spectral efficiency gains are offered without increasing the transmitted average optical power or sacrificing BER requirements, in moderate-to-strong turbulence conditions. Furthermore, the proposed variable rate transmission technique is applied to multiple input multiple output (MIMO) FSO systems, providing additional improvement in the achieved spectral efficiency as the number of the transmit and/or receive apertures increases.

I. INTRODUCTION

Atmospheric turbulence causes rapid received-intensity fluctuations that can undermine FSO reliability and communication rate. The paper proposes adapting S-PSK modulation order to instantaneous fading and a target BER, using a bias independent of modulation order.

I. INTRODUCTION

  • Turbulence-induced fading arises from stochastic atmospheric refractive-index variation and can severely affect FSO-link reliability and communication rate.The introduction notes that vulnerability to adverse atmospheric conditions limits widespread FSO deployment.Source: §I · p. 2
  • Spatial diversity can improve FSO performance, but adding apertures increases system cost and physical size..Source: §I · p. 2
  • Adaptive transmission varies basic transmission parameters with fading intensity, allowing higher data rates under favorable conditions without additional optical power or sacrificing performance requirements.Prior FSO approaches include adaptive pulse-position modulation, coding with on-off keying, adaptive power, and joint power and PAM-order adaptation.Source: §I · pp. 2–3
  • S-PSK transmits properly biased PSK-modulated RF signals through IM/DD optical systems; its constant envelope keeps average and peak optical power constant per symbol.The introduction also states that S-PSK offers increased demodulation performance compared with PAM under turbulence.Source: §I · p. 3
  • The proposed S-PSK strategy adapts modulation order to instantaneous turbulence-induced fading and a predefined BER while requiring a modulation-order-independent DC bias.The paper evaluates spectral efficiency and BER across turbulence strengths and target BERs, and applies the policy to MIMO FSO with equal-gain combining.Source: §I · p. 3

II. NON-ADAPTIVE SUBCARRIER PSK INTENSITY MODULATION

The non-adaptive model transmits a DC-biased PSK subcarrier through an IM/DD FSO channel with turbulence-induced fading. It assumes block fading and a high-SNR Gaussian-noise approximation at the receiver.

II. NON-ADAPTIVE SUBCARRIER PSK INTENSITY MODULATION

  • The system uses a subcarrier signal to modulate optical-carrier intensity and transmits it through an atmospheric-turbulence fading channel.A DC bias ensures the transmitted waveform satisfies the non-negativity constraint; average optical power P and modulation index μ set the transmitted power.Source: §II · p. 4, A. System and Channel Model · p. 4

A. System and Channel Model

  • The RF PSK signal is shaped by pulse g(t), with carrier frequency fc, symbol period T, phase φk, and modulation order M.The optical signal is detected directly, the DC bias is removed, and a standard RF PSK demodulator processes the received signal.Source: A. System and Channel Model · p. 4
  • At high SNR, ambient-light shot noise is approximated as Gaussian, and the received electrical signal is formed after direct detection and bias removal.The model identifies optical-to-electrical efficiency, shaping-pulse energy, turbulence fading, and complex Gaussian noise in the receiver signal.Source: A. System and Channel Model · pp. 4–5
  • Turbulence fading is modeled as constant over a block of K symbols, and the analysis assumes a sufficiently long message to reveal long-term ergodic properties.The fading is normalized to avoid changing average power, and Io is set to 1 without loss of generality.Source: A. System and Channel Model · p. 5

B. BER Performance

The section specifies conditional BER expressions by modulation order and obtains average BER by averaging over the turbulence distribution. It notes that this average can be evaluated efficiently by Gauss-Hermite quadrature.

B. BER Performance

  • Conditional BER depends on turbulence statistics and modulation order, with a BPSK expression for M = 2 and an approximation for M > 2.The BPSK expression is conditioned on fading coefficient I; the higher-order expression is approximate.Source: B. BER Performance · pp. 5–6
  • The conditional error expressions use the Gaussian Q-function, introduced as the Q-function in the BER derivation.Source: B. BER Performance · p. 6
  • Average BER is obtained by integrating the conditional BER over the turbulence fading probability density function.The section states that the integral can be efficiently evaluated using Gauss-Hermite quadrature.Source: B. BER Performance · p. 6

C. Capacity Upper Bound

The paper uses an upper bound on optical-intensity-channel capacity as a benchmark for its analysis. The bound is averaged over turbulence, with a high-electrical-SNR approximation used to obtain the form applied in the study.

C. Capacity Upper Bound

  • An upper bound for optical-intensity-channel capacity with multiple subcarrier modulation is applied to the one-subcarrier FSO system.The conditioned bound depends on fading coefficient I.Source: C. Capacity Upper Bound · p. 6
  • At high electrical SNR, the conditioned capacity bound is approximated using bandwidth W and a residue that vanishes exponentially as noise standard deviation approaches zero.Source: C. Capacity Upper Bound · p. 6
  • The unconditional approximative capacity upper bound is obtained by averaging over the fading distribution and is used as a benchmark in subsequent analysis.The paper states that this averaged expression has a closed form in the Appendix.Source: C. Capacity Upper Bound · p. 6

III. ADAPTIVE MODULATION STRATEGY

The strategy adapts S-PSK modulation to improve spectral efficiency without increasing average optical power or sacrificing performance requirements.

  • The adaptive transmission strategy is designed to improve the spectral efficiency of S-PSK FSO systems.Source: §III · p. 6
  • It aims to do so without increasing transmitted average optical power.Source: §III · p. 6
  • It also aims to preserve the system’s performance requirements.Source: §III · p. 6

A. Mode of Operation

The receiver estimates each block’s fading state from pilot symbols, then selects a modulation order to maximize transmitted bits per symbol under the target BER. The method uses fading regions to assign modulation orders and calculates achievable spectral efficiency from the average transmitted bits and the system bandwidth.

A. Mode of Operation

  • Pilots let the receiver estimate the block’s fading state and select a modulation order for the remaining symbols, informing the transmitter over a reliable RF feedback path.Source: A. Mode of Operation · p. 7
  • The selection objective is to maximize bits per symbol interval using the largest modulation order that meets the target BER.Source: A. Mode of Operation · p. 7
  • The fading range is partitioned into regions associated with available modulation orders, with boundaries set to meet the target BER.Source: A. Mode of Operation · p. 7
  • Transmission stops when fading is below the first region boundary.Source: A. Mode of Operation · p. 7

1) Achievable Spectral Efficiency:

2) Average Bit Error Rate:

The average BER is calculated from the average number of erroneous bits relative to the total transmitted bits, accounting for S-PSK’s bandwidth requirement compared with PAM.

C. Application to MIMO FSO systems

The MIMO extension sends S-PSK using repetition coding across transmit apertures and combines signals from receive apertures. It applies the adaptive modulation rule to the MIMO fading state, with transmit power and total receive aperture area normalized against systems without diversity.

IV. RESULTS & DISCUSSION

The adaptive scheme’s spectral-efficiency gains are strongest under moderate-to-strong turbulence, while its average BER stays below the target. In MIMO, more apertures improve spectral efficiency at higher SNR, but not below 8 dB.

IV. RESULTS & DISCUSSION

  • 14 dB spectral-efficiency gain over non-adaptive BPSK at σx = 0.5 and Po = 10−3; gains decrease as turbulence weakens.At σx = 0.1, non-adaptive BPSK reaches S = 0.5 at lower SNR, so instantaneous-fading adaptation is particularly effective in moderate-to-strong turbulence.Source: §IV · p. 11
  • The adaptive system’s average BER stays below the target Po in every examined turbulence and target-BER case.At high average SNR, its performance approaches that of the non-adaptive system using the largest modulation order, which the adaptive scheme selects in this regime.Source: §IV · p. 11
  • With moderate turbulence, Po = 10−3, and N = 3 modulation orders, adding transmit and/or receive apertures increases spectral efficiency except below 8 dB average SNR.Below 8 dB, increasing apertures decreases ξ, raises {yj}, and reduces spectral efficiency; as SNR rises, the aperture increase lowers {yj} and raises spectral efficiency.Source: §IV · p. 11

V. CONCLUSIONS

The paper proposes adaptive S-PSK intensity modulation for turbulent FSO links, selecting modulation order from instantaneous fading and a target BER. Results show gains in moderate-to-strong turbulence and added high-SNR gains as MIMO apertures increase.

V. CONCLUSIONS

  • Adaptive S-PSK yields a 14 dB spectral-efficiency gain at S = 0.5, Po = 10−3, and σx = 0.5, while low turbulence favors adaptation based on average electrical SNR.In MIMO FSO, spectral efficiency also improves at high SNR as transmit and/or receive apertures increase.Source: §V · p. 12

APPENDIX

The appendix derives a closed-form expression for (14), using substitutions and cited integral identities to obtain (15).

APPENDIX

  • The appendix starts from the turbulence-fading probability density function to derive a closed-form expression for (14).It substitutes y = ln I, applies cited integral identities to reduce intermediate expressions, and obtains (15).Source: APPENDIX · p. 12
Loading 1002.1897v1…