Source-linked AI summary

Minimum k-path vertex cover

Boštjan Brešar, František Kardoš, Ján Katrenič, Gabriel Semanišin

arXiv:1012.2088v2math.COcs.CCcs.DM

TL;DR

The paper studies the minimum k-path vertex cover problem, extending vertex cover and motivated in part by wireless sensor network security. It proves NP-completeness, gives tractability and exact results for important graph classes, develops bounds and estimates, and establishes a general bound for ψ_3(G).

  • Problem

    The paper asks how to characterize and compute the minimum vertex set intersecting every path of order k, a generalization motivated partly by wireless sensor network security.

  • Method

    The paper uses reductions from minimum vertex cover, structural analysis of graph classes, and algorithmic and bounding arguments for trees and general graphs.

  • Results

    The problem is NP-complete for every fixed k≥2; trees admit a linear-time optimal algorithm, and ψ_3(G) ≤ (2n + m)/6 for every graph with n vertices and m edges.

  • Takeaways & Limitations

    k-path vertex cover extends vertex cover while remaining tractable on bounded-treewidth graphs such as trees and supporting general upper-bound estimates.

Abstract

from arXiv · show

A subset S of vertices of a graph G is called a k-path vertex cover if every path of order k in G contains at least one vertex from S. Denote by ψ_k(G) the minimum cardinality of a k-path vertex cover in G. It is shown that the problem of determining ψ_k(G) is NP-hard for each k \geq 2, while for trees the problem can be solved in linear time. We investigate upper bounds on the value of ψ_k(G) and provide several estimations and exact values of ψ_k(G). We also prove that ψ_3(G) \leq (2n + m)/6, for every graph G with n vertices and m edges.

1. Introduction and motivation

The paper introduces k-path vertex cover as a generalization of vertex cover, motivated partly by security requirements in wireless sensor networks. It establishes complexity results, tractability on bounded-treewidth graphs, and upper bounds including a bound for ψ_3(G).

  • Definitions and motivation: Wireless sensor network security motivates covers that ensure at least one uncaptured node on each path of length k−1.The k-generalized Canvas scheme combines cryptographic primitives with network topology and distinguishes protected from unprotected devices.
  • Definitions and motivation: A k-path vertex cover intersects every path of order k, and ψ_k(G) is the minimum size of such a cover.For k=2, this is the usual minimum vertex cover; ψ_3(G) corresponds to the dissociation number.
  • Complexity and tractability: NP-hardness follows for determining ψ_k, because the minimum vertex cover problem reduces to the minimum k-path vertex cover problem.The paper develops this reduction in Section 2.
  • Complexity and tractability: Linear-time algorithms apply on graphs with bounded treewidth, including trees, series-parallel graphs, and outerplanar graphs, by Courcelle’s theorem.The paper determines exact values for trees and presents a linear-time optimal algorithm, while also giving a tight upper bound for ψ_3(G) on outerplanar graphs.
  • Bounds: ψ_3(G) ≤ (2n + m)/6 for every graph G with n vertices and m edges.The paper also provides several estimates based on vertex degrees.

2. NP-completeness

The paper proves NP-completeness for fixed k≥2 by reducing vertex cover to k-path vertex cover, then derives approximation consequences and a simple k-approximation algorithm.

  • Reduction: For k=2, k-path vertex cover coincides with the ordinary vertex cover problem.For k>2, the proof reduces vertex cover to k-path vertex cover.
  • NP-completeness: For every fixed integer k≥2, deciding whether a graph has a k-path vertex cover of size at most t is NP-complete.Membership in NP follows because all paths of length k−1 can be checked in polynomial time.
  • Reduction: The reduction attaches a path of floor((k−1)/2) new vertices to every original vertex and preserves the minimum cover size.Examples include attaching a leaf for k=3 or 4 and a two-vertex path for k=5 or 6.
  • Reduction: Any new vertex selected in a cover can be replaced by its nearest original vertex without losing coverage.This transformation yields a cover consisting only of original vertices, after which uncovered edges would create an unsecured k-vertex path.
  • Approximation: It is NP-hard to approximate k-PVCP within 1.3606 for k>2 unless P=NP.The reduction transfers any polynomial-time r-approximation for k-path vertex cover to minimum vertex cover.
  • Approximation: A polynomial-time k-approximation repeatedly selects all k vertices of a found k-vertex path and removes them.At least one selected vertex belongs to an optimal solution; for fixed k, path finding uses a known randomized algorithm with running time O(2^k n^O(1)).

3. Path vertex cover for trees

For trees, PVCPTree constructs an optimal k-path vertex cover by repeatedly selecting and removing properly rooted subtrees. The algorithm runs in linear time and yields the paper’s sharp tree bound.

  • Algorithm: PVCPTree repeatedly adds the root v of a properly rooted subtree T_v to the cover and removes T_v from the tree.A properly rooted subtree contains a k-vertex path, while deleting its root leaves none.
  • Correctness: Theorem 2 states that PVCPTree returns an optimal k-path vertex cover for every tree.The proof uses induction: every k-path cover must contain a vertex from the selected subtree.
  • Size bound: Each iteration adds one cover vertex while removing a subtree with at least k vertices.This counting argument gives the cardinality bound used for trees.
  • Complexity and bound: The algorithm can be implemented in linear time and returns a solution of size at most |V(T)|/k.The paper describes this as a sharp upper bound for arbitrary trees.

4. Outerplanar graphs

The paper derives an upper bound for 3-path vertex covers in outerplanar graphs and shows its sharpness through a construction with large required covers. The proof uses maximal outerplanar supergraphs, Hamiltonian orderings, and black-white vertex structure.

  • Upper bound: Theorem 3 establishes an upper bound on ψ3(G) for every outerplanar graph G of order n.The proof reduces to a maximal outerplanar supergraph on the same vertices.
  • Upper-bound proof: A maximal outerplanar supergraph is 2-connected, has triangular inner faces, and is Hamiltonian along its outer-face boundary.These properties enable the coloring and cyclic-order argument.
  • Sharpness: The paper states that the factor in Theorem 3 is best possible for outerplanar graphs.This conclusion follows from the lower-bound construction.
  • Sharpness: The construction in the sharpness argument produces a 2-connected outerplanar graph H on 2n vertices with ψ3(H) ≥ n.The vertices are divided into n pairs, and the pair analysis forces the lower bound.

5. Upper bounds on degree of vertices

The paper develops degree-based upper bounds for minimum k-path vertex covers, including a Caro–Wei-type generalization and constructive bounds for 3-path vertex covers. It also gives a tight bound based on graph order and size.

  • A generalized Caro–Wei theorem provides an upper bound for ψ_k(G) for every graph G.
  • A random-ordering construction builds a set S by adding each vertex unless at least two neighbors are already present.The probability that vertex v_i enters S is described as 2/(1+d(v_i)).
  • The resulting set S induces a 1-degenerated graph, and the construction is combined with a minimum k-path vertex cover of S.
  • A linear-time algorithm returns a 3-path vertex cover for arbitrary graphs, with bounds including |V(G)|/2 for maximum degree at most 3.The construction uses repeated protection of high-degree vertices followed by a subcubic-graph procedure.
  • The bound based on n and m is tight for suitable graphs when b ≤ a ≤ 2b.The constructions use disjoint unions of 4-cycles and graphs obtained from K6 by removing a perfect matching.
Loading 1012.2088v2…