Source-linked AI summary

No-go theorem for the composition of quantum systems

Maximilian Schlosshauer, Arthur Fine

arXiv:1306.5805v3quant-ph

TL;DR

The paper asks whether deterministic hidden-variables theories can reproduce quantum predictions while composing subsystem states classically for nonentangled tensor-product systems. It reformulates the PBR strategy in terms of tracking and proves a no-go theorem for theories satisfying assumption A and PIc,tr, including qubit models consistent on their own domain. The result challenges classical realist intuitions about composing “real states,” while noting that the composition assumptions themselves may be questionable.

  • Problem

    The paper examines whether deterministic hidden-variables theories can consistently compose subsystem states for nonentangled tensor-product systems while reproducing quantum predictions.

    Source: pp. 1, 3
  • Method

    The paper replaces PBR’s association-based composition premise with tracking-based PIc,tr and combines it with assumption A, a two-dimensional lemma, and the PBR measurement argument.

    Source: p. 3
  • Results

    No ontological deterministic hidden-variables theory satisfying assumption A and PIc,tr can reproduce quantum mechanics, including qubit models that are quantum-consistent on their domains.

    Source: p. 3
  • Takeaways & Limitations

    The result challenges classical realist intuitions that the complete states of independently prepared subsystems suffice to determine outcomes on their tensor product, even without entanglement.

    Source: pp. 3–4

    The no-go result depends on PIc,tr, whose physical rationale the paper questions; the same reservations apply to PIc in the PBR theorem.

    Source: pp. 3–4

Abstract

from arXiv · show

Building on the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem, we derive a no-go theorem for a vast class of deterministic hidden-variables theories, including those consistent on their targeted domain. The strength of this result throws doubt on seemingly natural assumptions (like the "preparation independence" of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem) about how "real states" of subsystems compose for joint systems in nonentangled states. This points to constraints in modeling tensor-product states, similar to constraints demonstrated for more complex states by the Bell and Bell-Kochen-Specker theorems.

Loading 1306.5805v3…