Source-linked AI summary

Structure preserving numerical methods for the Vlasov equation

Lukas Einkemmer

arXiv:1604.02616v1math.NA

TL;DR

Long-time Vlasov–Poisson integration must handle high-dimensional, nonlinear dynamics across widely separated timescales while preserving physically relevant invariants. The paper studies semi-Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin methods, compares them with cubic spline interpolation, and reports two-stream-instability simulations indicating better entropy behavior for sLdG.

  • Problem

    Vlasov–Poisson simulation is challenging because it may involve six-dimensional phase space, nonlinearity, and physical timescales much larger than the plasma period, while long-time integration requires preserving important invariants.

  • Method

    The paper studies semi-Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin methods for Vlasov–Poisson and compares them with cubic spline interpolation using characteristic-based advection.

  • Results

    Numerical simulations indicate that cubic spline interpolation decreases entropy, whereas the semi-Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin scheme does not show this deficiency; higher-order approximations also provide significant advantages.

  • Takeaways & Limitations

    The study evaluates numerical methods by tracking mass, momentum, energy, positivity, entropy, and L2-norm behavior over long integrations.

  • Takeaways & Limitations

    The report considers the electrostatic Vlasov–Poisson model, with the potential used to determine the electric field.

Abstract

from arXiv · show

To preserve a number of physically relevant invariants is a major concern when considering long time integration of the Vlasov equation. In the present work we consider the semi-Lagrangian discontinuous Galerkin method for the Vlasov-Poisson system. We discuss the performance of this method and compare it to cubic spline interpolation, where appropriate. In addition, numerical simulations for the two-stream instability are shown.

Loading 1604.02616v1…