Source-linked AI summary

Comparison of permutationally invariant polynomials, neural networks, and Gaussian approximation potentials in representing water interactions through many-body expansions

Thuong T. Nguyen, Eszter Székely, Giulio Imbalzano, Jörg Behler, Gábor Csányi, Michele Ceriotti, Andreas W. Götz, Francesco Paesani

arXiv:1802.00564v1physics.chem-ph

TL;DR

Accurate water simulations require potential-energy surfaces that represent many-body interactions reliably. The paper compares PIP, neural-network, and Gaussian-approximation representations within MB-pol for short-range two-body and three-body terms. All three representations show similar accuracy on reference interactions and small water-cluster energies, supporting their combined use with a physically grounded many-body framework.

  • Problem

    Accurate representation of multidimensional water potential-energy surfaces remains necessary for realistic simulations, while pairwise models do not reproduce both gas- and condensed-phase properties.

    Source: §I · pp. 3–4
  • Method

    The study compares PIP, BPNN, and GAP representations of MB-pol short-range two-body and three-body interactions.

    Source: §V · p. 21
  • Results

    The three analytical representations achieve similar accuracy for two-body and three-body reference data and small water-cluster energetics within chemical accuracy.

    Source: §V · p. 21
  • Takeaways & Limitations

    Combining a physically sound many-body framework with flexible machine-learning representations provides a promising route to accurate, efficient, and transferable potential-energy surfaces.

    Source: §V · p. 22

Abstract

from arXiv · show

The accurate representation of multidimensional potential energy surfaces is a necessary requirement for realistic computer simulations of molecular systems. The continued increase in computer power accompanied by advances in correlated electronic structure methods nowadays enable routine calculations of accurate interaction energies for small systems, which can then be used as references for the development of analytical potential energy functions (PEFs) rigorously derived from many-body expansions. Building on the accuracy of the MB-pol many-body PEF, we investigate here the performance of permutationally invariant polynomials, neural networks, and Gaussian approximation potentials in representing water two-body and three-body interaction energies, denoting the resulting potentials PIP-MB-pol, BPNN-MB-pol, and GAP-MB-pol, respectively. Our analysis shows that all three analytical representations exhibit similar levels of accuracy in reproducing both two-body and three-body reference data as well as interaction energies of small water clusters obtained from calculations carried out at the coupled cluster level of theory, the current gold standard for chemical accuracy. These results demonstrate the synergy between interatomic potentials formulated in terms of a many-body expansion, such as MB-pol, that are physically sound and transferable, and machine-learning techniques that provide a flexible framework to approximate the short-range interaction energy terms.

I. INTRODUCTION

Accurate water simulations require models that capture many-body interactions across phases. This study combines the MB-pol many-body framework with alternative machine-learning representations of short-range interactions.

  • Accurate molecular models that reproduce water from the gas to condensed phase remain difficult to develop.Source: §I · p. 3
  • Pairwise-additive models often fail to reproduce both gas- and condensed-phase water properties because many-body effects are important.Source: §I · pp. 3–4
  • The many-body expansion provides a rigorous framework in which low-order interaction terms can be fitted to CCSD(T)/CBS data and higher-order effects represented by classical induction.Source: §I · p. 4
  • MB-pol has reproduced water properties from the dimer and small clusters through liquid water, ice, and interfacial systems.Source: §I · p. 5
  • The study compares PIP, Behler-Parrinello neural-network, and Gaussian-approximation representations for MB-pol short-range two-body and three-body terms.Source: §4.5 · pp. 5–6
  • The BPNN- and GAP-based MB-pol expressions achieve essentially the same accuracy as the original PIP-based expression.Source: §4.5 · p. 6

II. MB-POL FUNCTIONAL FORM AND COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS

MB-pol combines a many-body expansion with classical long-range terms and flexible short-range representations for water 2B and 3B interactions. This work compares PIPs, BPNNs, and GAPs as alternative machine-learning representations of those short-range terms.

MB-pol functional form

  • MB-pol explicitly combines 1B, 2B, and 3B terms with classical N-body polarization.The framework uses a many-body expansion and accounts for higher-body interaction contributions through polarization.Source: §II · p. 6
  • The 2B term separates classical long-range electrostatics, induction, and dispersion from short-range quantum-mechanical overlap effects.The long-range components use modified TTM4-F electrostatics and induction plus a damped C6 dispersion term.Source: §II · p. 6
  • The 3B term combines long-range classical induction with a short-range expression for complex interactions.Classical 3B induction captures essentially all of the 3B interaction energy at long range.Source: §II · p. 6

Switching and cutoffs

  • Switching functions smoothly turn off short-range corrections beyond preset oxygen–oxygen separation cutoffs, producing a smooth differentiable potential-energy surface.The switching construction is applied to the short-range 2B and 3B terms.Source: §II · p. 7

Machine-learning representations

  • The study compares PIPs with Behler–Parrinello neural networks and Gaussian approximation potentials for representing water 2B and 3B short-range interactions.The original PIP-MB-pol representation is evaluated alongside BPNN-MB-pol and GAP-MB-pol alternatives.Source: §II · p. 7

A. Training sets and reference energies

The study trains and evaluates short-range interaction models on CCSD(T)-quality water dimer and trimer data sampled across relevant geometries and condensed-phase configurations. The final datasets contain 42,069 2B and 12,347 3B configurations, with isolated test sets for evaluation.

Training-set composition

  • The datasets sample water dimers and trimers spanning minima, saddle points, compressed geometries, and configurations extracted from MD or PIMD simulations.The sampling includes liquid-water and small-cluster environments over relevant temperature and pressure conditions.Source: A. Training sets and reference energies · p. 8

Reference energies

  • The 2B and 3B reference energies were obtained at the complete-basis-set limit of CCSD(T).Training energies for the short-range models were formed by subtracting the MB-pol long-range baseline from the quantum-mechanical reference energies.Source: A. Training sets and reference energies · p. 8

Dataset filtering

  • 42,069 configurations remained in the 2B training set after removing binding energies at or above 60 kcal/mol and separations beyond the 6.5 Å cutoff.The trimer dataset was fully retained with 12,347 configurations.Source: A. Training sets and reference energies · p. 8

Dataset splitting

  • The final dataset contains 12,347 fully retained trimer configurations alongside the filtered dimer set.Both datasets were randomly split into training, validation, and isolated test sets at a ratio of 0.81:0.09:0.1.Source: A. Training sets and reference energies · p. 8

B. Water cluster test sets

Water cluster test energies for n = 4−6 were assembled with a many-body expansion using CCSD(T)-quality 2B and 3B terms and explicitly correlated higher-body contributions. The resulting reference construction combines consistent low-order data with CCSD(T)-F12b estimates above 3B.

Cluster test sets

  • Reference interaction energies for (H2O)n clusters with n = 4−6 used MP2 and RI-MP2 optimized geometries.The cluster geometries were taken from a prior reference study.Source: B. Water cluster test sets · p. 9

Many-body reference construction

  • The cluster interaction energies were computed with a many-body expansion using 2B and 3B energies at the same level as the MB-pol training sets.These 2B and 3B terms were effectively evaluated at the CBS limit of CCSD(T).Source: B. Water cluster test sets · p. 9
  • Higher-order contributions above 3B were obtained from explicitly correlated CCSD(T)-F12b calculations with the VTZ-F12 basis set.The selected basis yields results close to the complete-basis-set limit.Source: B. Water cluster test sets · p. 9

III. MANY-BODY MODELS

The many-body models represent water interactions with permutationally invariant polynomial expansions built from distance-based functions and symmetrized monomials.

B. Behler-Parrinello neural networks

The Behler–Parrinello neural-network models represent short-range 2B and 3B energies through atom-centered symmetry functions and shared atomic subnetworks.

C. Gaussian Approximation Potentials

The Gaussian Approximation Potential models use Gaussian-process regression with SOAP descriptors to interpolate atomic energies from local neighbor geometries.

A. 2B and 3B interactions, and the structure of the training data

The study evaluates PIP, BPNN, and GAP representations of water 2B and 3B interactions using structured training data and regional error analysis. All three methods achieve similar accuracy, while sampling density strongly affects errors and farthest-point selection improves 2B fitting efficiency.

2B interactions

Training-data structure

3B interactions

Training-data structure

B. Water clusters

For water clusters containing 4–6 molecules, MB-pol with PIP, BPNN, or GAP short-range representations reproduces coupled-cluster interaction energies accurately. Errors remain below 0.3 kcal/mol for 2B and 3B terms, while total-energy errors increase with cluster size but never exceed 0.8 kcal/mol.

  • Total interaction-energy errors increase with cluster size as individual 2B and 3B errors accumulate, especially for 2B contributions.This accumulation is associated with configurations containing repeating dimer and trimer units.Source: B. Water clusters · p. 20
  • 2B errors are similar across PIP-MB-pol, BPNN-MB-pol, and GAP-MB-pol, whereas GAP-MB-pol has smaller 3B errors.The difference is most apparent in the three-body interaction energies.Source: B. Water clusters · p. 20
  • Ring-type isomers show particularly large errors because extended hydrogen bonding and symmetry produce non-negligible higher-body contributions.These higher-body contributions can have errors comparable to the 2B and 3B terms.Source: B. Water clusters · pp. 20–21
  • Despite these larger deviations, total interaction-energy errors never exceed 0.8 kcal/mol and the relative ordering of isomers is retained.The authors conclude that all three approaches are suitable for accurate water-cluster interaction energies within MB-pol.Source: B. Water clusters · p. 21

V. CONCLUSIONS

The study compares PIP, BPNN, and GAP representations of MB-pol short-range two- and three-body energies. All three reproduce reference interaction energies and small water-cluster energetics with similar accuracy, supporting machine learning within a physically grounded many-body framework.

  • PIP, BPNN, and GAP representations were evaluated for MB-pol short-range two-body and three-body interaction energies.Source: §V · p. 21
  • The three models were assessed against large CCSD(T)/CBS datasets and small water-cluster energetics.Source: §V · p. 21
  • 1 kcal/mol: small water-cluster energetics were consistently within chemical accuracy for all three models.Source: §V · p. 21
  • The three models were effectively equivalent, consistently showing similar performance for many-body interactions in water within MB-pol.Source: §V · p. 21
  • Further accuracy improvements require increasing reference calculations and optimizing training sets to cover relevant configuration space more uniformly.Source: §V · p. 22
  • Combining accurate machine-learning short-range terms with physically sound long-range contributions offers a promising route to accurate, efficient, and transferable potential energy surfaces.Source: §V · p. 22
Loading 1802.00564v1…