Source-linked AI summary

Microsoft Malware Classification Challenge

Royi Ronen, Marian Radu, Corina Feuerstein, Elad Yom-Tov, Mansour Ahmadi

arXiv:1802.10135v1cs.CR

TL;DR

Malware classification must handle organized evasion and vast volumes of polymorphic files. This paper describes the Microsoft dataset and compares publications using it, finding a growing benchmark and outlining potential research directions.

  • Problem

    Malware analysis must process vast numbers of polymorphic files that can represent the same family and behavior in many modified forms.

  • Method

    The paper describes the dataset and compares the main contributions of publications citing or evaluating it.

  • Results

    More than 50 research papers and thesis works cited the challenge and dataset, including conceptual discussions and partial or complete evaluations.

  • Takeaways & Limitations

    The comparison supports understanding existing contributions and identifying potential research directions for work using the dataset.

Abstract

from arXiv · show

The Microsoft Malware Classification Challenge was announced in 2015 along with a publication of a huge dataset of nearly 0.5 terabytes, consisting of disassembly and bytecode of more than 20K malware samples. Apart from serving in the Kaggle competition, the dataset has become a standard benchmark for research on modeling malware behaviour. To date, the dataset has been cited in more than 50 research papers. Here we provide a high-level comparison of the publications citing the dataset. The comparison simplifies finding potential research directions in this field and future performance evaluation of the dataset.

1 Introduction

The paper frames malware classification as a response to organized, evasive malware and the enormous volume of polymorphic files requiring analysis. It presents family identification and the Microsoft dataset as resources for addressing this challenge.

  • Well-funded malware syndicates invest in technologies that evade traditional protection, causing significant financial losses to computer-system users.
  • Microsoft’s realtime anti-malware products run on over 600M computers, generating tens of millions of daily data points for analysis.
  • Polymorphism modifies or obfuscates files within the same malware family, making similar malicious behavior appear as many distinct files.
  • Grouping files into malware families is presented as a first step toward classification and detecting new malicious files by family.
  • Microsoft provided an unusually large malware dataset to support research on grouping malware variants into their respective families.

2 Dataset

The dataset is an almost half-terabyte collection of known malware from nine families, combining labeled files, headerless hexadecimal binary content, and IDA-generated metadata.

  • The dataset is almost half a terabyte uncompressed and contains known malware representing 9 different families.
  • Each file has an identifier, a unique 20-character hash, and an integer class label corresponding to one of the 9 malware families.
  • Raw file data contains hexadecimal representations of binary content without headers, while a metadata manifest records information such as function calls and strings.
  • The metadata manifest was generated using the IDA disassembler tool.

3 Citations Comparison

More than 50 papers and theses cited the challenge or dataset, spanning conceptual references and studies that evaluated proposed methods on the dataset.

  • More than 50 research papers and thesis works cited the competition and dataset after the competition ended in April 2015.
  • Some papers used the challenge for abstract comparisons or to emphasize machine learning’s importance for large-scale industrial malware classification.
  • Other papers performed partial or complete dataset evaluations to assess the effectiveness or efficiency of approaches across various tasks.

4 Conclusion and Future Directions

The paper characterizes the Microsoft dataset and compares contributions across citing publications. This comparison supports understanding existing work and identifying potential research directions.

  • The paper describes the characteristics of the Microsoft Malware Classification Challenge dataset.
  • The dataset is described as becoming a standard dataset, with more than 50 papers citing it.
  • The authors enumerate references as extensively as possible and compare their main contributions concerning the dataset.
  • The comparison helps clarify existing contributions and potential research directions.
  • The authors aim to keep the reference table updated as additional dataset-related work is reported.
Loading 1802.10135v1…