Source-linked AI summary

Artificial Intelligence for Social Good

Gregory D. Hager, Ann Drobnis, Fei Fang, Rayid Ghani, Amy Greenwald, Terah Lyons, David C. Parkes, Jason Schultz, Suchi Saria, Stephen F. Smith, Milind Tambe

arXiv:1901.05406v1cs.CY

TL;DR

AI offers near-term opportunities for social good beyond ethical, safety, and legal concerns. This report presents deployments and potential applications across urban computing, health, environmental sustainability, and public welfare, alongside crosscutting barriers.

Abstract

from arXiv · show

The Computing Community Consortium (CCC), along with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), and the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), co-sponsored a public workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Social Good on June 7th, 2016 in Washington, DC. This was one of five workshops that OSTP co-sponsored and held around the country to spur public dialogue on artificial intelligence, machine learning, and to identify challenges and opportunities related to AI. In the AI for Social Good workshop, the successful deployments and the potential use of AI in various topics that are essential for social good were discussed, including but not limited to urban computing, health, environmental sustainability, and public welfare. This report highlights each of these as well as a number of crosscutting issues.

Overview

AI has reached a phase in which advances in research, data, and computing create opportunities to shape its development for social good. The workshop examined successful and potential AI applications across urban computing, health, environmental sustainability, public welfare, and crosscutting issues.

  • AI’s recent progress in basic research, data availability, and computing power creates an opportunity to shape its future development.Source: Overview · p. 5
  • AI can deliver societal benefits while ethical, safety, and legal concerns remain important considerations for research and policy.Source: Overview · p. 5
  • The 2016 workshop discussed successful deployments and potential AI uses in urban computing, health, environmental sustainability, and public welfare.Source: Overview · p. 5

Urban Computing

AI for urban computing is being used to move from large-scale mobility data to predictive and prescriptive transportation decisions. Pilot systems show benefits from adaptive traffic control and on-demand mobility, but broader deployment requires multi-modal scaling and understanding behavioral effects.

Technology Enablers

  • AI enables urban transportation systems to progress from descriptive analytics to predictive models and prescriptive optimization, game theory, and mechanism design.Large-scale instrumentation captures travel patterns, while privacy remains an important consideration.Source: Technology Enablers · p. 6
  • Pilot systems demonstrate real-time traffic-light optimization and on-demand, multi-modal transportation addressing first- and last-mile gaps.Source: Technology Enablers · p. 6

Technical Challenges

  • Transportation pilots must scale to multi-modal city models and account for behavioral changes that affect system efficacy.Source: Technical Challenges · p. 6

Evidence-based Policy Making

  • Urban AI can support policy experiments that measure mobility responses across population segments before transportation policies are fully implemented.Source: Evidence-based Policy Making · p. 6
  • 25% lower travel times, over 40% lower wait times, and 21% lower emissions were achieved by Surtrac in an initial Pittsburgh deployment.Surtrac senses traffic and allocates green time in real time; the deployment expanded to 50 interconnected intersections, with plans for 150 more.Source: Case Study: Real-Time, Adaptive… · p. 7, Figure 1 · p. 7

Sustainability

AI for sustainability combines ecosystem data, models, decision-making, and monitoring to support evidence-based management. Applications span sensing and species modeling through adaptive, risk-sensitive policies, while major challenges include scale, data quality, changing systems, infrastructure, and long-term support.

Sustainability

Data

  • Sensor networks, citizen science, imagery, and trained surveys collect ecosystem data that AI can optimize, classify, and use to identify individuals and species.Examples include TAHMO weather stations, IBEIS animal identification, and computer vision for freshwater macroinvertebrates.Source: Data · pp. 8–9

Models

  • Species models estimate populations and distributions, characterize habitat and climate effects, and predict migration, dispersal, reproduction, and mortality.Source: Models · p. 9

Policy Optimization

  • Conservation policies combine ecological and economic models with AI planning and optimization under uncertainty, including habitat purchasing, temporary field rentals, and coastal adaptation.The examples use network cascade analysis, Monte Carlo optimization, multi-scale machine learning, and partially observable Markov decision processes.Source: Policy Optimization · pp. 9–10

Opportunities and Challenges in the Medium Term

  • Broader ecosystem management requires multi-scale data integration, models that represent changing climate and species behavior, reliable sensors, bias-aware measurement models, local computation, and sustainable financing.Source: Opportunities and Challenges in the… · pp. 10–11

Long Term Prospects

  • Long-term sustainability requires precautionary monitoring, iterative model extension and policy reoptimization, and risk-sensitive methods that control downside risks and address unknown unknowns.Source: Long Term Prospects · pp. 11–12

Health

AI-enabled health applications use large-scale clinical and social data to improve surveillance, decision support, and precision medicine. Reported examples include earlier sepsis detection, foodborne-illness inspection targeting, and clinical tools for transfusion and wound-care decisions.

Success Stories

  • nEmesis uses social-media self-reports to identify restaurants associated with foodborne illness and significantly improved inspection effectiveness in Las Vegas.Source: Success Stories · p. 12
  • SC2i deployed clinical decision-support tools for invasive fungal infection treatment and evaluated massive-transfusion prediction to reduce unnecessary transfusions.Source: Success Stories · p. 12
  • Real-time tools integrating diverse electronic-health-record data identify severe sepsis risk earlier than standard care, enabling timely treatment associated with over 50% lower mortality.Source: Case Study: Making ‘Meaningful Use’… · pp. 12–13

1) Targeted therapy decisions

High variation among patients with chronic disease makes optimal therapy difficult to choose, motivating AI systems that use longitudinal clinical data to support targeted and increasingly precise decisions.

2) New sensors, new healthcare delivery

AI for health combines new data sources, shared infrastructure, and collaborative modeling to support personalized health, while confronting incentive, bias, privacy, and security barriers.

2) New sensors, new healthcare delivery

Near Term Enablers

  • Data sharing requires incentives, common models, cloud platforms, and shared test beds that lower barriers to health research.Non-U.S. data can also accelerate model development and testing.Source: Near Term Enablers · pp. 13–14

Longer Term Opportunity

  • Personalized health integrates clinical, genomic, socioeconomic, demographic, environmental, and social data to support longitudinal treatment plans.The stated opportunity is to prevent hospitalization and address broader life circumstances, not only specific diseases.Source: Longer Term Opportunity · p. 14
  • Collaborative models should let decision makers test counterfactual treatment or diagnostic scenarios while incorporating messy data and uncertainty.Source: Longer Term Opportunity · p. 14
  • Observational health data can encode unrelated phenomena and care-process effects, so models must address bias and transportability.Uncorrected bias may cause harm as provider practice patterns change.Source: Longer Term Opportunity · p. 14

Barriers to Progress

  • AI-health progress requires cross-disciplinary training, task-aware privacy methods, portable data policies, and secure integrated records.Performance must be assessed for accountability and reliability in changing living systems.Source: Barriers to Progress · pp. 14–15

Grand Challenge

  • The grand challenge is a learning healthcare system that observes data, models health, supports interventions, captures outcomes, and adapts from feedback.Source: Grand Challenge · p. 15

Public Welfare

AI for public welfare applies prediction, data integration, and decision-support to improve public services and address justice, education, safety, health, and economic-development problems. The report emphasizes that impact depends on sustained collaboration, infrastructure, human decision-makers, long-term evaluation, and attention to privacy, fairness, and local constraints.

Public Welfare

  • AI for public welfare aims to enhance quality of life and increase the equity, effectiveness, and efficiency of public services.Source: Public Welfare · p. 15

Social Issues AI can help address

  • Public-welfare applications include predicting justice-system interactions, targeting anti-blight investments, forecasting workforce skills, improving emergency dispatch, preventing police incidents, and supporting student graduation.Source: Social Issues AI can help address · p. 15

Success Stories and Case Studies

Gaps and Barriers

  • Key barriers include insufficient experienced collaborators, too few visible projects, missing platforms for integrating sensitive public datasets, long evaluation horizons, and legal or regulatory hurdles.Source: Gaps and Barriers · p. 17

Fundamental Issues

  • Public-welfare AI must account for privacy, transparency, traceability, bias, uncertainty, individual preferences, social dynamics, and the organizational capacity to respond locally.Source: Fundamental Issues · p. 18

Opportunities

  • Research opportunities include better data collection and federation, behavioral prediction, policy evaluation, intervention support, and models robust to bias, missing data, heterogeneity, and changing conditions.Source: Fundamental Issues · p. 18, Opportunities · p. 18

Research Challenges

Cross Cutting Issues

AI for Social Good is presented as an active research direction requiring use-inspired, interdisciplinary work alongside attention to impact, transparency, and human control. The report argues that appropriate incentives and local engagement can help AI enhance quality of life across broad applications.

  • AI research is already being applied to urban computing, sustainability, health, and public welfare, but this social-good trend needs encouragement.Source: Cross Cutting Issues · pp. 19–20

Use inspired research

  • Use-inspired research grounds AI questions in actual applications, including settings where unreliable technology access creates fundamentally different data and research needs.Source: Cross Cutting Issues · p. 20

Interdisciplinary teams and new styles of research

Cross Cutting Issues

  • Evaluating social-good AI requires measuring real-world impact rather than relying only on modeling efficiency or simulation improvements.Impact measurement takes time and may not fit a six-month AI conference cycle, motivating new publication venues and incentives.Source: Cross Cutting Issues · p. 20

Interpretability, transparency, accountability

  • Interpretability and transparency are needed because opaque models may be rejected or may rely on biased, racist, sexist, or illegal inferences.Source: Cross Cutting Issues · p. 20

Human-AI boundary

  • Human-AI applications must define an appropriate boundary, especially when decision aids operate in domains involving vulnerable populations.Respect for autonomy implies that humans should remain in charge when they have superior control, insight, or knowledge.Source: Cross Cutting Issues · p. 20

Cross Cutting Issues

  • With appropriate forethought and incentives, AI can enhance quality of life at personal, national, and global levels across applications that cannot all be anticipated today.The report encourages connections between basic AI research and state, local, and nonprofit organizations.Source: Cross Cutting Issues · p. 20
  • Many social-good problems and solutions are local, creating opportunities for researchers to engage communities and explain AI’s limitations and potential benefits.Source: Cross Cutting Issues · p. 21

Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Social Good Workshop

The workshop convened participants to discuss successful and potential AI applications for social good. The report also documents the workshop’s public-facing materials and a post-workshop roundtable involving researchers, government representatives, industry, and nonprofit-related participants.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Social Good Workshop

Post-workshop AI Roundtable Discussion

  • The post-workshop AI roundtable included participants from universities, government agencies, industry, and research organizations.The listed participants represented organizations including OSTP, AAAI, CCC, NSF, DoD, Microsoft Research, and multiple universities.Source: Post-workshop AI Roundtable Discussion · p. 26
Loading 1901.05406v1…