Source-linked AI summary

Machine learning meets quantum physics

Sankar Das Sarma, Dong-Ling Deng, Lu-Ming Duan

arXiv:1903.03516v1physics.pop-phcond-mat.dis-nnphysics.comp-phquant-ph

TL;DR

Quantum many-body states are exponentially costly to describe, while existing tensor-network methods become inefficient for highly entangled states. The paper examines neural-network representations and their applications, showing that RBMs can efficiently represent certain highly entangled states, while deeper networks broaden the representable class. It also identifies unresolved questions for quantum-enhanced machine learning.

  • Problem

    Fully describing arbitrary quantum many-body states requires exponentially much information, and conventional tensor networks are inefficient for highly entangled states.

    Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · pp. 4–5
  • Method

    The paper reviews tensor-network and neural-network representations of quantum states, including RBM-based variational learning and related applications.

    Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · pp. 4–6
  • Results

    Neural-network representations can efficiently describe certain highly entangled quantum states, and deep Boltzmann machines can represent almost all physical quantum states with at most polynomial parameter scaling.

    Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 5
  • Takeaways & Limitations

    Neural-network approaches provide a route to solving many-body problems involving large entanglement that are challenging or unsolvable with conventional methods.

    Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 6

    Some physically interesting states lack efficient RBM descriptions, and quantum-enhanced machine learning has no unified theory.

    Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · pp. 5, 7

Abstract

from arXiv · show

The marriage of machine learning and quantum physics may give birth to a new research frontier that could transform both.

TWO REPRESENTATIONS

Quantum many-body states require exponentially large descriptions, motivating representations that compress them efficiently. Tensor networks work well for area-law states, while neural-network representations can efficiently capture highly entangled states and support related quantum algorithms.

The representation problem

  • An arbitrary N-qubit quantum state requires 2^N complex numbers for a complete description.Each qubit has two configurations, producing 2^N possible configurations.Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 4

Tensor-network representation

  • Tensor networks efficiently represent many physical states whose information scales polynomially with system size.Their efficiency is associated with the entanglement area law.Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 4

Neural-network representation

  • RBMs represent certain topological states with a number of parameters that scales linearly with the number of qubits.For the toric-code state, each hidden neuron connects to four nearby visible neurons, giving roughly four parameters per qubit.Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 5

Scope and open questions

  • An additional hidden layer broadens applicability: deep Boltzmann machines can efficiently represent almost all physical quantum states with at most polynomial parameter scaling.The paper also notes that some physically interesting states lack efficient RBM descriptions.Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 5

Neural-network representation

  • Without short-range connectivity, RBMs can represent volume-law states with only linearly scaling parameter counts.A construction with each visible neuron connected to at most three hidden neurons describes maximally entangled states efficiently.Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 5

Entanglement and efficiency

  • Highly entangled states can make conventional tensor-network descriptions exponentially expensive.Volume-law states require exponentially many tensor-network parameters.Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · pp. 5–6

Applications

  • RBM-based methods captured ground states and time evolution, reconstructed highly entangled states, and addressed long-range-interaction systems.These applications include variational learning and quantum state tomography.Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 6

Scope and open questions

  • Quantum-enhanced machine learning still lacks a unified theory, including criteria for when quantum computers significantly expedite learning tasks.The paper identifies efficient analysis of large quantum data sets as another open question.Source: TWO REPRESENTATIONS · p. 7
Loading 1903.03516v1…