Source-linked AI summary

Chatbots for Mental Health Support: Exploring the Impact of Emohaa on Reducing Mental Distress in China

Sahand Sabour, Wen Zhang, Xiyao Xiao, Yuwei Zhang, Yinhe Zheng, Jiaxin Wen, Jialu Zhao, Minlie Huang

arXiv:2209.10183v1cs.CLcs.HC

TL;DR

With mental-health services in China described as inadequate, this study tests Emohaa, a Chinese conversational agent combining CBT-based cognitive support and emotional support. Participants experienced fewer distress symptoms after using Emohaa, and emotional support had a complementary effect, mainly on depression and insomnia.

  • Problem

    The study examines whether conversational agents can provide cognitive and emotional support and reduce mental distress, amid inadequate access to mental-health services in China.

    Source: §1 · p. 3
  • Method

    Emohaa combines CBT-based guided conversations and exercises for cognitive support with a platform for users to discuss emotional problems.

    Source: §1 · p. 3, §5 · p. 11
  • Results

    Emohaa users experienced fewer mental-distress symptoms, and emotional support had a complementary effect, mainly on depression and insomnia.

    Source: §5 · pp. 11–12
  • Takeaways & Limitations

    The authors conclude Emohaa could be a valuable tool for reducing users’ mental distress and highlight the potential of generative conversational agents for mental-health support.

    Source: §5 · p. 12

    The sample size and study duration were inadequate to generalize the findings to the public.

    Source: §4.2 · p. 11

Abstract

from arXiv · show

The growing demand for mental health support has highlighted the importance of conversational agents as human supporters worldwide and in China. These agents could increase availability and reduce the relative costs of mental health support. The provided support can be divided into two main types: cognitive and emotional support. Existing work on this topic mainly focuses on constructing agents that adopt Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) principles. Such agents operate based on pre-defined templates and exercises to provide cognitive support. However, research on emotional support using such agents is limited. In addition, most of the constructed agents operate in English, highlighting the importance of conducting such studies in China. In this study, we analyze the effectiveness of Emohaa in reducing symptoms of mental distress. Emohaa is a conversational agent that provides cognitive support through CBT-based exercises and guided conversations. It also emotionally supports users by enabling them to vent their desired emotional problems. The study included 134 participants, split into three groups: Emohaa (CBT-based), Emohaa (Full), and control. Experimental results demonstrated that compared to the control group, participants who used Emohaa experienced considerably more significant improvements in symptoms of mental distress. We also found that adding the emotional support agent had a complementary effect on such improvements, mainly depression and insomnia. Based on the obtained results and participants' satisfaction with the platform, we concluded that Emohaa is a practical and effective tool for reducing mental distress.

1. Introduction

Mental health needs are rising in China, while access to appropriate care remains limited. Conversational agents may offer accessible support, but research has emphasized CBT-based cognitive support, with less evidence on emotional support and Chinese-language agents.

1. Introduction

  • The introduction situates the study amid rising mental-health concerns and service challenges, including limited professional training and stigma that can contribute to low diagnostic accuracy and treatment delays.It cites pandemic-era increases in depression and anxiety and reports that about 17.4% of 22,330 adults in an international study met criteria for probable insomnia disorder.Source: §1 · p. 2
  • In China, 16.57% of adults had lifetime prevalence of mental disorders and 4.98% had 12-month anxiety prevalence; the paper also cites limited appropriate treatment and inadequate service quality and quantity.The passage attributes limited treatment to low mental-health awareness and poor service accessibility.Source: §1 · pp. 2–3
  • Conversational agents could increase support availability and reduce the relative costs of seeking it, and prior work found that people were willing to disclose emotional problems to machines.The paper presents self-disclosure as important for providing support and as evidence of user rapport with agents.Source: §1 · p. 3
  • The paper distinguishes cognitive support, which helps people reassess situations, from emotional support, which offers validation and understanding to relieve distress.The passage describes human supporters as limited in number and professional help as unaffordable for many.Source: §1 · p. 3
  • Prior conversational-agent research mainly delivered CBT-based cognitive support, while machine-based emotional support research was limited and much of the field’s agent research was conducted in English.Prior emotional-support prototypes either lacked empirical effectiveness testing or used predefined statements rather than responses based on users’ messages.Source: §1 · p. 3
  • The study investigates a Chinese agent providing both CBT-based cognitive support and open-ended emotional support, assessing effectiveness, acceptability, and practicality among mainland Chinese participants.The authors hypothesized that frequent use involving daily exercises and emotional venting would improve distress symptoms.Source: §1 · p. 3

2.1. Emohaa

Emohaa combines a template-based CBT platform for cognitive support with an open-ended dialogue platform for emotional support. Its CBT exercises and strategy-controlled dialogue model are designed to provide distinct forms of support.

2.1. Emohaa

  • Emohaa has two platforms: a template-based CBT system with predefined options and exercises, and a generative dialogue platform for open-ended emotional support.Source: §2.1 · p. 3

2.1.1. CBT-based

  • The CBT platform offers automatic-thought training to identify and replace harmful thoughts with rational perspectives, alongside more than 20 guided expressive-writing exercises.The exercises cover varied topics and guide users through each step via interactive conversations.Source: §2.1.1 · p. 4

2.1.2. ES-based

  • For the emotional-support platform, the authors translated the English ESConv dataset into Chinese and used its Helping Skills Theory-based strategies, including self-disclosure, affirmation, and suggestions.The design aimed to let users freely discuss emotional problems and receive responses based on their situation.Source: §2.1.2 · p. 4
  • The emotional-support platform uses a Chinese dialogue model to select support strategies from conversation history and generate strategy-conforming responses relevant to users’ messages.The platform also uses a classifier to detect signs of suicidal thoughts and recommends relevant authorities’ contact information when such signs are detected.Source: §2.1.2 · p. 4

2.2. Measures

The study assessed depression, anxiety, affect, and insomnia using four self-report measures. Each measure captured symptoms or affect over a specified scale and timeframe.

2.2.1. PHQ-9

  • Depression was measured with the 9-item PHQ-9, which rates symptom frequency and severity over the previous two weeks on a 0–3 scale.The study reported pre-test and post-test Cronbach’s alpha values of .78 and .85.Source: §2.2.1 · p. 4

2.2.2. GAD-7

  • Anxiety was measured with the 7-item GAD-7, assessing symptom frequency and severity over the previous two weeks on a 0–3 scale.The scale’s pre-test and post-test Cronbach’s alpha values were both .84.Source: §2.2.2 · p. 4

2.2.3. PANAS

  • Affect was measured with the 20-item PANAS, with separate positive- and negative-affect dimensions scored on a 5-point Likert scale.Higher scores indicate higher affect; the passage reports pre-test and post-test Cronbach’s alpha values for both dimensions.Source: §2.2.3 · p. 5

2.2.4. ISI

  • Insomnia was measured with the 7-item ISI, which assesses sleep difficulties, interference with daily functioning, and distress from sleep problems.Items were scored from 1 to 4; summed scores classify insomnia from none (0–7) to severe (22–28).Source: §2.2.4 · p. 5

2.3. Participants

Eligible participants were randomly assigned to CBT-based Emohaa, full Emohaa, or control. The study collected baseline and post-intervention measures, but only 134 of 247 randomized participants provided partial or complete T2 data.

2.3. Participants

  • The study randomly assigned eligible participants to Emohaa (CBT-based), Emohaa (Full), or control after recruiting adults able to use smartphones who were not in therapy or experiencing physical issues that might affect psychological state.Of 412 registrants, 301 met the criteria; 30 extra participants were allocated to control because of expected waiting time and potential control-group attrition.Source: §2.3 · p. 5
  • Sixteen participants at suicide risk and 38 with more than half their data missing were excluded; 72 CBT-based, 70 full-Emohaa, and 105 control participants completed baseline questionnaires.Participants were asked to complete the same measures one day after the intervention; one-month follow-up data were unavailable for control because participants could receive other interventions.Source: §2.3 · p. 5
  • Of 247 randomized participants, 134 (54.2%) provided partial or complete T2 data, and dropout analyses found no significant baseline differences on the reported demographic or symptom measures.The tested measures included age, gender, working tenure, PHQ-9, GAD-7, positive and negative affect, and insomnia.Source: §2.3 · p. 5

2.4. Data Collection and Privacy

The study collected repeated distress measures while requiring daily platform use in intervention groups and monitoring adherence and conversation reliability.

2.4.1. Guidelines

  • All participants completed mental-distress questionnaires at T1 and T2.Source: §2.4.1 · p. 5
  • Intervention participants used the CBT platform daily for an automatic-thinking exercise and guided diary; the Full group also conversed daily for 5–10 turns.Source: §2.4.1 · pp. 5–6

2.4.2. Quality Control

  • The researchers checked platform use every three days and monitored conversations; 3 of 34 participants were asked to repeat duplicated messages.Source: §2.4.2 · p. 6
  • Table 1 presents user demographics for the studied sample.Source: Table 1 · p. 7
  • Table 2 reports analyses of variance in mental-health outcomes; the F-test assesses Condition × Time differences in change rates.Source: Table 2 · p. 7, §2.4.2 · p. 7

2.5. Privacy and Ethics Statement

The study protected participant privacy through restrictions on identifiable disclosures and secure, anonymized data handling, and obtained informed consent and IRB approval.

  • Participants were instructed not to share personal information that could identify them in conversations with Emohaa.Source: §2.5 · p. 7
  • Experiment data were anonymized and stored securely, with research access available by request to the corresponding author.Source: §2.5 · p. 7
  • The study received Institutional Review Board approval, and participants were informed of its purpose and consented to take part.Source: §2.5 · p. 7

3. Results

Across the 134-person sample, both Emohaa groups improved on several distress indicators, with insomnia outcomes differing between intervention groups over follow-up. Participants discussed everyday concerns and generally rated the platforms positively, while also identifying usability and response-quality problems.

3.1. User Demographics

  • Among 134 participants, 107 were female; mean age was 31.81 years, and baseline scores indicated mild depression and anxiety and sub-threshold insomnia.All participants were from mainland China.Source: §3.1 · p. 7

3.2. Effects of Emohaa Intervention

  • Both Emohaa groups improved depression, anxiety, and negative affect, while positive affect showed no group-by-time interaction; insomnia declined significantly only for CBT-based Emohaa.The control group’s depression increased, while its anxiety and insomnia did not significantly change; full Emohaa’s insomnia decrease was marginal (p = .053).Source: Figure 2 · p. 8, §3.2 · pp. 8–9

3.2.1. Supplemental Analyses

  • At three-week follow-up, insomnia returned to baseline in the CBT-based group but continued improving in the full Emohaa group; anxiety rose again in both groups, with a longer-lasting effect for full Emohaa.Only 16 CBT-based and 27 full Emohaa participants returned follow-up questionnaires; the control group was not followed because participants received other interventions.Source: §3.2.1 · p. 9

3.3. Conversation Analysis

  • Participants discussed feelings, work, mood, and study pressure most often, and commonly sought mindfulness, rest, health, and emotional support.They averaged seven conversation sessions, with 17 turns per session on average.Source: §3.3 · p. 9

3.4. Acceptability and Feasibility

  • Most users reported satisfaction with CBT-platform functionality (56/69, 81.16%) and rated the emotional-support platform an appropriate chatting partner (24/31, 77.42%); feedback cited technical and content problems.Participants also reported rigid or incoherent generated responses and difficulty maintaining conversational context.Source: §3.4 · pp. 9–10

4. Discussion

Emohaa use was associated with reduced mental distress, while adding the emotional-support platform showed potential complementary benefits. The study’s short duration and sample size limit generalization, and participants reported technical, content, and conversational shortcomings.

4.1. Main Findings

  • Compared with controls, Emohaa users had significant reductions in depression and anxiety and considerable reductions in negative affect and insomnia.Source: §4.1 · p. 10
  • No significant short-term outcome differences emerged between Emohaa groups, but the emotional-support group showed fewer insomnia indicators and a smaller T3 anxiety increase.Source: §4.1 · p. 11
  • Most participants were satisfied and would recommend Emohaa; many described the emotional-support platform as understanding, attentive, and a place to vent.Source: §4.1 · p. 11
  • Open conversation about users’ chosen topics may complement CBT-based templates and exercises in improving mental distress.Source: §4.1 · p. 11

4.2. Limitations and Future Work

  • The short study and limited sample cannot support generalizing the findings to the public; control-group follow-up data were also unavailable.Source: §4.2 · p. 11
  • Participants reported technical problems, unclear instructions, and limited exercise content and choices, prompting plans to improve the platform.Source: §4.2 · p. 11
  • The emotional-support platform sometimes forgot prior turns or gave contextually irrelevant replies, potentially impairing engagement and rapport.Source: §4.2 · p. 11

5. Conclusions

The conclusions present Emohaa as a Chinese mental-health support agent combining CBT-based exercises with open-ended emotional support. Participants experienced fewer symptoms, and emotional support had a complementary effect, particularly for depression and insomnia.

  • Emohaa combines template-based CBT exercises and guided conversations with a platform for discussing emotional problems.Source: §5 · p. 11
  • Participants experienced fewer mental-distress symptoms after using Emohaa during the study.Source: §5 · p. 11
  • Adding generative emotional-support dialogue had a complementary effect on improvements, mainly for depression and insomnia.Source: §5 · p. 12

A. User Interface

The CBT-based interface supports guided expressive writing and automatic-thinking exercises. The figures also include an example of the separate emotional-support platform.

Loading 2209.10183v1…