Source-linked AI summary

Neural Renormalization Group Flow for Percolation

Anaclara Alvez, Luca Camagna, Sergio Chibbaro, Cyril Furtlehner, François Landes, Gianluca Manzan, Lorenzo Mensi

arXiv:2608.26764v1cond-mat.dis-nncs.LG

TL;DR

The paper examines a scale-shared encoder–decoder for predicting percolation and reconstructing largest-cluster masks across lattice scales. The same local rules are reused at every scale, so the trainable parameter count remains independent of lattice size.

  • Problem

    The paper examines whether one scale-shared encoder–decoder can predict percolation and largest-cluster membership across lattice sizes.

  • Method

    A recursively applied shared encoder maps configurations to a latent vector for crossing-probability prediction, while a shared decoder reconstructs largest-cluster masks.

  • Results

    The architecture uses the same number of trainable parameters for all lattice sizes.

  • Takeaways & Limitations

    Scale sharing makes the model’s parameter count independent of lattice size.

Abstract

from arXiv · show

Machine learning offers a possible route to data-driven real-space renormalization when the relevant observables are nonlocal and difficult to prescribe explicitly. We explore this idea for two-dimensional site percolation developping a supervised, scale-shared neural architecture. The model recursively applies the same learned coarse-graining rule across scales, producing a latent field from which the crossing probability is predicted, while a corresponding fine-graining decoder reconstructs the largest-cluster mask. Trained only on small lattices, the model extrapolates to substantially larger systems, recovers the spanning cluster with high fidelity, and produces observables obeying the expected finite-size scaling near the critical point. We observe that to get such performance it is key that the learned latent representation exhibits critical fluctuations and scale-dependent flows consistent with the renormalization-group structure of percolation.

END MATTER

The scale-shared encoder–decoder applies the same local rules across lattice scales, compressing configurations to a latent vector for percolation prediction and reconstructing largest-cluster masks. With C = 32 and hidden width 64, the architecture has 55,189 trainable parameters independent of lattice size.

  • Architectural details: The same encoder rule fθ and decoder rule f′θ are applied at every scale, so parameter count is independent of lattice size L.Scale sharing is used throughout the encoder–decoder architecture.
  • Encoder: C = 32 channels and hidden width 64 define the encoder, whose 2×2 coarse-graining reduces sites by 4 and halves linear system size at each application.After k = log2 L iterations, the configuration maps to a single latent vector hk ∈ R^C.
  • Encoder: The encoder readout predicts percolation probability from the single latent vector and is trained with binary cross-entropy on the percolation label.The latent representation is produced after iterating the shared coarse-graining rule across scales.
  • Decoder: The decoder upsamples coarse representations, concatenates same-resolution encoder features, and applies a shared local 2×2 fine-graining rule with U-Net-like skip connections.The final decoder combines its output with the original binary configuration to predict largest-cluster membership probabilities.
  • Parameter count: 55,189 trainable parameters comprise the full encoder–decoder, and this number is the same for all lattice sizes.For C = 32 and hidden width 64, the encoder rule contains 19,584 parameters, the classifier readout 2,177, the decoder rule 32,896, and the final decoder readout 532.
Loading 2608.26764v1…