Source-linked AI summary

Group-Invariant Statistics Determine Embedding Geometry: Harmonic Analysis of Representations from Bach to the Night Sky

Liam Storan, Andreas Tolias, Nina Miolane

arXiv:2610.00647v1cs.LG

TL;DR

Prior work explained circular embeddings through cyclic symmetry in co-occurrence statistics, leaving open what more general symmetries imply for embedding geometry. This paper derives irrep-based predictions and tests them on months, chords, and celestial objects, finding structured geometries consistent with group symmetry.

  • Problem

    Prior explanations linked circular embeddings to cyclic co-occurrence symmetry, leaving open what arbitrary statistical symmetries imply for embedding geometry.

    Source: §1 · p. 1
  • Method

    The authors derive embedding predictions from irreducible representations for group-invariant statistics and apply the theory to torsors and homogeneous spaces.

    Source: §1 · p. 2, §4 · p. 4, §7 · p. 7
  • Results

    The theory accounts for circular month embeddings, T/I-related chord geometry, and spherical-harmonic structure in celestial-object representations.

    Source: §1 · p. 2
  • Takeaways & Limitations

    The three geometries are presented as consequences of underlying symmetry in data statistics, which constrains permissible embeddings.

    Source: §8 · p. 9

    The theory applies to word families with at least approximately group-invariant co-occurrence statistics, and its application to LLM activations rests on an empirical premise.

    Source: §8 · p. 9

Abstract

from arXiv · show

The representations that language models learn for concepts such as months, weekdays, and places display consistent geometric structure: circles and saddle-shaped "Pringle" manifolds. Recent work traced these structures to $\textit{translation symmetry}$ in word co-occurrence statistics, deriving the observed Fourier geometry when co-occurrence depends only on distance on an abelian lattice of concepts. We demonstrate that more general notions of symmetry lead to equally structured predictions. Considering symmetries defined by arbitrary finite groups, compact groups, and homogeneous spaces, we prove that whenever the co-occurrence statistics of a word family are invariant under a group $G$, the learned word embeddings consist of matrix elements of the irreducible representations (irreps) of $G$. Circles and Pringles arise when $G$ is cyclic, in which case the irreps are Fourier modes. We verify the irrep structure in three experimental settings. (i) The cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_{12}$: for the months of the year we recover the known circular geometry. (ii) A dihedral group acting on the major and minor triads: we unify two classical observations -- that transposition and chord inversion form a group ($T/I$) acting on chords (music theory), which $\textit{implies}$ that the well-known "circle of fifths" emerges in learned chord embeddings (machine learning). (iii) We explain and reproduce a recently discovered spherical representation of celestial objects in large language models (LLMs) as a spherical-harmonic embedding derived from our theory. Our results demonstrate that the geometry of learned representations is often a consequence of the statistical symmetry of underlying data.

1 INTRODUCTION

The paper generalizes symmetry-based explanations of embedding geometry from cyclic translation to arbitrary group symmetries. It derives irrep-based predictions and tests them on months, musical chords, and celestial objects.

Motivation

  • For months, prior cyclic-symmetry work explains circular embeddings when co-occurrence depends on distance on a cyclic latent lattice.The January–February and November–December co-occurrences are reported as approximately equal in general text.Source: §1 · p. 1

Contributions

  • For group-invariant co-occurrence statistics, the authors derive word embeddings from irreducible-representation matrix elements, extending Fourier-based cyclic predictions.The theory covers arbitrary finite and compact groups, as well as homogeneous spaces.Source: §1 · p. 2
  • Bach chorale chord statistics are approximately T/I-invariant, and the predicted circle of fifths matches learned chord embeddings at per-chord cosine 0.98.The invariance captures R2 = 0.822 of the co-occurrence structure; the same structure is observed in ChordBERT.Source: §1 · p. 2
  • Celestial-object representations in five of seven examined LLMs form degree-ordered spherical-harmonic blocks, and co-occurrence statistics reproduce the spherical structure.The reported co-occurrence match is per-object cosine 0.55 (median 0.68).Source: §1 · p. 2
  • The authors present the three geometries as consequences of symmetries in word co-occurrence statistics, with cyclic symmetry yielding the familiar month circle.The paper frames the results as analytical expressions for quadratic embedding models and suggests the same rule may describe LLM activations.Source: §1 · p. 2, Figure 1 · p. 2

2 RELATED WORK

Prior work connects word embeddings to co-occurrence statistics and identifies cyclic patterns, while group-theoretic analyses of neural representations often study models trained on group operations.

From word statistics to their embeddings

  • Skip-gram with negative sampling implicitly factorizes shifted PMI, while GloVe directly fits log co-occurrence.Karkada et al. (2025) derive a quadratic embedding model in which embeddings factorize normalized statistics M⋆, the premise adopted here.Source: §2 · p. 3

Symmetric statistics and embeddings

  • Prior cyclic-symmetry work derives sinusoidal embeddings, and empirical studies report circles for days and months and decoded spatial or temporal measurements.The authors position their sky-sphere analysis as addressing a question raised by Berdnikov & Liokumovich (2026).Source: §2 · p. 3

Group theory in interpretability

  • Group-theoretic studies of neural networks analyze models trained on group operations, whereas this paper studies natural-corpus statistics that happen to be group-invariant.Here, the group acts on concepts rather than defining the training task.Source: §2 · p. 3

3 BACKGROUND ON GROUP THEORY

The section introduces groups, their actions on word sets, and irreducible representations as the concepts used to describe symmetry-driven embedding structure.

Groups

  • A group has an associative operation, identity, and inverses; cyclic groups are Abelian, while dihedral groups and SO(3) are examples of non-Abelian groups.The paper uses Z12, D12, and SO(3) for months, chords, and celestial objects, respectively.Source: §3 · p. 3

Group actions

  • A free and transitive group action makes a word set a torsor, while a transitive action with stabilizer K identifies it with the homogeneous space G/K.The months exemplify a torsor; the sphere is SO(3)/SO(2), where SO(2) stabilizes a point by rotations about its axis.Source: §3 · p. 3

Irreducible representations

  • A unitary representation decomposes into irreps, whose matrix entries can be scalar for Abelian groups or higher-dimensional for non-Abelian groups.The paper’s embedding theory uses these representation entries.Source: §3 · p. 3

Group Fourier transform

  • The group Fourier transform of a finite-group function sums its values weighted by conjugate representation matrices, with an integral replacing the sum for compact groups.Source: §3 · p. 4

4 THEORY: FROM INVARIANT STATISTICS TO HARMONIC GEOMETRY

The theory links group-invariant co-occurrence statistics to embedding coordinates drawn from irreducible representations. It treats group torsors and homogeneous spaces, with the sphere as the continuous example.

Statistical invariance and embedding characterization

  • The theory assumes group-invariant statistics and models the co-occurrence kernel as C(g^-1h), with bi-K-invariance for a homogeneous space.The empirical-embedding characterization uses leading PCA scores of the centered normalized co-occurrence matrix’s positive eigenpairs, up to orthogonal transform and realification.Source: §4 · p. 4

Theory: Structure of word embeddings

  • For a word set whose co-occurrence statistics are group-invariant, the authors derive embeddings from irreducible-representation matrix elements, ordered by their eigenvalue contributions.The finite-group theorem also has a compact-group version; the data kernel determines which irrep columns are most pronounced.Source: §4 · p. 4

Cyclic example

  • The month example re-derives the cyclic prediction: co-occurrence statistics approximately follow a Z12-invariant kernel, and the embeddings show two circular planes.The caption reports an average kernel prediction of raw data at R2 = 0.87 and median angular steps of 31°/month for k = 1 and 66°/month for k = 2.Source: Figure 2 · p. 5

Homogeneous space S2

  • For the sphere S2, predicted embedding coordinates are spherical harmonics, with degrees ordered by positive coefficients determined by the kernel and Legendre polynomials.Degree-ℓ harmonics form subspaces of dimension 2ℓ + 1.Source: §4 · p. 5

Implementation

  • Because embeddings are real but theoretical eigenvectors may be complex, the experiments convert them to real coordinates using irrep-dependent realification.Source: §4 · p. 5

5 THE CYCLIC CASE: MONTHS AND THE PRINGLE

The month case tests the cyclic-group prediction using text co-occurrences and recovers the known circular embedding geometry. The learned embeddings also exhibit the Pringle structure as a sinusoid over a circular base.

The cyclic case: months and the Pringle

  • Using text8, a 17M-token Wikipedia dump, the analysis tests the cyclic group Z12 acting on the twelve months.The study reports recovering the results of Karkada et al. (2026) using group theory rather than Fourier analysis.Source: §5 · p. 5

Predictions

  • For months indexed by Z12, the irreps are one-dimensional complex Fourier modes, so the theory predicts a direct product of circles.The circle radii are derived from the corpus co-occurrence kernel.Source: §5 · p. 5

Results: The embeddings realize the cyclic irreps

  • The first four empirical PCs match the theoretical month predictions at 0.96 per-month cosine (median 0.97), versus a label-shuffle null mean of 0.35.The classic Pringle appears in the first three dimensions as a sinusoid on a circular base.Source: §5 · p. 6

6 THE NONABELIAN CASE: DIHEDRAL CHORD GEOMETRY IN BACH

The paper tests its non-Abelian predictions on Bach chorales, where T/I symmetry of chord co-occurrences predicts dihedral-irrep geometry for major and minor triads. The resulting embeddings exhibit interleaved circles, including the circle of fifths.

The nonabelian case: dihedral chord geometry in Bach

  • The 24 major and minor triads from 371 Bach chorales form a D12-torsor under transposition–inversion, setting up the non-Abelian test.The corpus contains 24k chord tokens, with the 24 triads analyzed as a subsystem of 92 sonority types.Source: §6 · p. 6

Predictions

  • The D12 prediction places major and minor chords on interleaved circles in shared planes, with corpus-determined radii.The model considers five two-dimensional irreps; the prediction omits one-dimensional irreps that are not strongly present.Source: §6 · p. 6

Statistical assumption is verified: Chord co-occurrence statistics exhibit dihedral symmetry

  • T/I-invariant chord statistics explain R2 = 0.822 of M ⋆, close to transposition-only Z12 invariance at R2 = 0.830 despite seven fewer parameters.None of 2,000 random chord relabelings approaches the observed T/I score (p = 5×10−4).Source: §6 · p. 7

Result I: The embeddings realize the dihedral irreps

  • The leading Bach chord-embedding plane matches the predicted interleaved major/minor circles at 0.98 per-chord cosine and is the circle of fifths, a column of D12 irrep E5.Predictions for the first three planes (six dimensions) have per-chord cosines of 0.98, 0.94, and 0.80, respectively.Source: §6 · p. 7

Result II: The circle of fifths

  • The circle of fifths, previously observed in chord embeddings from popular songs, is derived here as a column of the two-dimensional E5 irrep.The plane organizes major and minor chords as interleaved circles at a corpus-dictated radius.Source: §6 · p. 7

Result III: Same structure in chord representation model

  • ChordBERT also exhibits the circle of fifths, while T/I is at least comparably predictive to alternative symmetry models and most data-efficient on fewer chorales.The comparison includes hypotheses with more parameters than T/I.Source: §6 · p. 7

7 THE CONTINUOUS CASE: THE SKY SPHERE AS A HARMONIC EMBEDDING

The paper applies its group-theoretic prediction to celestial objects, treating angular-separation-dependent statistics as the condition for spherical-harmonic structure. It finds degree-ordered harmonics in LLM activations and a weaker related pattern in selected astronomy books.

Predictions

  • Under effective statistics invariant to angular separation, the theory predicts spherical harmonics as representation dimensions, including higher orders beyond the sphere-shaped ℓ=1 mode.The celestial sphere is the homogeneous space S2 = SO(3)/SO(2); applying the prediction to LLM residual streams is an extension beyond the theory's word-embedding setting.Source: §7 · p. 7

(Effective) statistical assumption is verified

  • The LLM Gram matrix is approximately a function of true angular separation: bin-averaged cosines predict it at R2 = 0.49, versus a permutation-null value of 0.002.The regression-kernel standard deviation also follows the curve shape of the predicted Gram matrix.Source: §7 · p. 8

Results: The embeddings realize the spherical harmonics

  • Five of seven examined models show degree-ordered spherical-harmonic blocks: modes 1–4 are ℓ=1, modes 5–8 are ℓ=2, and ℓ=3 also emerges.The ℓ=1 energy spans four modes because PC 1 is largely occupied by a star/constellation-type direction.Source: §7 · p. 8

Results: The same structure appears in an independent corpus

  • Four selected observing guides totaling 131k tokens yield a co-occurrence kernel over 39 objects correlated 0.95 with the model's activation kernel; text8 yields D = 0.01 (p = 0.48).The guides were selected from 24 open-source astronomy books; their genre mattered despite text8 having 130 times more tokens.Source: §7 · pp. 8–9

Comparison with spherical harmonics

  • Degree-1 structure is sharper in the model than in the books, and ℓ=2 is weaker than ℓ=1 in both settings but remains present.For ℓ=2, model per-object cosine similarity is 0.73 (median 0.82) versus a permutation null of 0.17 (95%: 0.21); books score 0.39 (median 0.44) versus null 0.27 (95% 0.35).Source: §7 · p. 9

Book corpus’s weaker harmonic structure results from less data

  • Simulations suggest the books' weaker harmonic structure is typical for their size, with roughly 32–64 times their corpus size expected to yield dipole structure as present as in the model.The observed book corpus was a typical or better draw in about 93% of 1,000 simulations.Source: §7 · p. 9

8 DISCUSSION

The months’ Pringle, Bach’s circle of fifths, and sky-sphere geometry are presented as predictions of one symmetry-based theory. Its scope requires approximately group-invariant co-occurrence statistics, and its application to LLM activations remains empirical.

8 DISCUSSION

  • The months’ Pringle, Bach’s circle of fifths, and the sky-sphere geometry are predictions of one theory in which statistical symmetry constrains permissible embeddings.The discussion also limits the theory to word families with approximately group-invariant co-occurrence statistics and notes that applying its theorems to LLM activations rests on an empirical premise.Source: §8 · p. 9

APPENDIX OVERVIEW

  • Appendices A–D present the theory, while Appendices E–G provide experimental details for the month, music, and sky-sphere settings.Appendix H addresses reproducibility, and Appendix I gives the AI use statement.Source: APPENDIX OVERVIEW · p. 11

A.1 FROM STATISTICS TO EMBEDDINGS

  • Word2vec-style embeddings are approximated from positive eigenpairs of the centered co-occurrence matrix, and symmetry can make those eigenpairs predictable.The paper uses this eigendecomposition to generate its empirical word embeddings.Source: §A.1 · p. 12

A.2 STATISTICAL INVARIANCE UNDER A GROUP

  • For a G-torsor, statistical invariance is equivalent to co-occurrence being determined by a real, inversion-symmetric kernel of the relative group element.A torsor is a set with a free and transitive group action; choosing a base point identifies it with the group.Source: §A.2 · pp. 12–13

B FINITE GROUPS

  • The finite-group analysis assumes a G-torsor word set whose co-occurrence matrix is statistically invariant and represented by a real kernel.Source: B FINITE GROUPS · p. 13

B.1 HARMONIC ANALYSIS PRELIMINARIES

  • For a real kernel satisfying C(g^-1) = C(g), each generalized Fourier transform is Hermitian and has an orthonormal eigenbasis.Source: §B.1 · p. 13

B.2 CENTERING REMOVES EXACTLY THE TRIVIAL REPRESENTATION

  • Centering changes only the constant eigenvector’s eigenvalue, thereby removing exactly the trivial representation without altering other eigenpairs.The constant mode is the trivial representation, so embeddings can be obtained by diagonalizing the co-occurrence matrix and discarding that mode.Source: §B.2 · p. 13

B.3 EMBEDDING THEOREM FOR FINITE GROUPS

For finite-group-invariant statistics on a G-torsor word set, the theorem constructs an orthonormal eigenbasis from irreducible-representation matrix elements. The section extends the framework to class-function kernels, real embeddings, cyclic and dihedral examples, and compact groups.

B.3 EMBEDDING THEOREM FOR FINITE GROUPS

  • For a finite group, the theorem constructs eigenvectors from irrep matrix elements, which form an orthonormal basis of the word space.The eigenvalues have multiplicity at least dρ; equivalent irreps and eigenbases allow unitary rotations without structural changes.Source: §B.3 · pp. 13–14

B.4 SPECIAL CASE: KERNEL IS CLASS FUNCTION

  • When the kernel is a class function, its Fourier transform on each irrep is a scalar identity, giving one eigenvalue per matrix coefficient.The class-function condition is constant values on conjugacy classes; the resulting eigenvalue has multiplicity dρ^2.Source: §B.4 · pp. 15–16

B.5 REALIFICATION OF EIGENFUNCTIONS

  • Realification depends on irrep type: real-type irreps yield real eigenvectors, while complex-type pairs can be combined into real vectors.Quaternionic-type irreps are the exception whose real eigenvectors do not follow neatly from the general formula; none occur in the experiments.Source: §B.5 · pp. 16–17

B.6 SPECIAL CASES: CYCLIC AND DIHEDRAL GROUPS

  • For Z12, conjugate Fourier modes form cosine-sine planes and predict concentric month circles; for D12, positive modes predict equal-radius interleaved circles for major and minor triads.The month circles advance 30k° per month, while the dihedral circles step 30h° per semitone and have relative offset 2φ; one-dimensional irreps are neglected in the experiments.Source: §B.6 · pp. 17–18

C COMPACT GROUPS

  • For compact groups, finite sums become Haar integrals and matrices become integral operators, whose compact self-adjoint structure supports a discrete spectrum.For predictions, eigenfunctions are sampled at the group elements corresponding to the finite word set.Source: C COMPACT GROUPS · p. 18

C.1 HARMONIC ANALYSIS PRELIMINARIES

  • On a compact group, irrep matrix coefficients form a complete orthonormal basis of L2(G), providing the harmonic-analysis basis for the theory.The irreps are unitary, and their equivalence classes are countably infinite in general.Source: §C.1 · p. 18

C.2 INTEGRAL OPERATOR AND THE DISCRETE SPECTRUM

  • A real symmetric kernel with C(g−1)=C(g) gives a self-adjoint Hilbert–Schmidt operator and therefore a discrete real spectrum.Centering removes the constant eigenfunction’s eigenvalue while retaining the other eigenpairs.Source: §C.2 · p. 19

C.3 EMBEDDING THEOREM FOR COMPACT GROUPS

The compact-group theorem extends the finite-group embedding result to integral operators on compact groups. It also frames the practical transition from continuous groups to finite word sets and specifies the invariant-kernel setup for homogeneous spaces.

C.3 EMBEDDING THEOREM FOR COMPACT GROUPS

  • For a compact group, the theorem gives an orthonormal eigenfunction basis of L2(G) from the eigenvectors of each irrep’s Fourier block.The nonzero eigenvalues are real and have finite multiplicity, at least dρ.Source: §C.3 · pp. 19–20

D HOMOGENEOUS SPACES, GELFAND PAIRS, AND THE SPHERE

D.1 SETUP

  • For X=G/K, the setup requires a real symmetric G-invariant kernel, equivalently a bi-K-invariant group kernel.Bi-K-invariance makes the kernel independent of the representative chosen for a coset.Source: §D.1 · p. 20

D.2 EMBEDDING THEOREM FOR HOMOGENEOUS SPACES

On a homogeneous space G/K, the theorem constructs an orthonormal basis from irreps of G, with each irrep contributing according to its K-fixed directions. The section specializes this result to Gelfand pairs and the sphere.

D.2 EMBEDDING THEOREM FOR HOMOGENEOUS SPACES

  • For G/K, the theorem yields an orthonormal basis of L2(X), with an irrep contributing according to its K-fixed directions.The theorem’s nonzero eigenvalues have finite multiplicity, at least dρ, and centering drops the trivial irrep.Source: §D.2 · p. 21

D.3 GELFAND PAIRS

  • For a Gelfand pair, each irrep has at most one K-fixed direction, simplifying the spectrum to scalar eigenvalues with eigenspaces spanned by the corresponding functions.The multiplicity-free condition is mρ=dim Vρ^K≤1.Source: §D.3 · p. 22

D.4 SPECIAL CASE: THE SPHERE

  • For the sphere S2=SO(3)/SO(2), the predicted modes are spherical harmonics, with degree-ℓ eigenvalues of multiplicity at least 2ℓ+1.The invariant kernel depends only on the inner product between points; centering sets λ0=0.Source: §D.4 · p. 22

E MONTHS: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

The month embeddings align closely with the theory’s circular predictions, and their leading modes are highly concentrated in the corresponding Fourier planes. Filtering the ambiguous word “may” improves the month-level cosine prediction.

E MONTHS: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

  • Filtering “may” to retain 3,129 month uses improves the per-month cosine prediction from 0.90 to 0.96.The filter keeps uses with nearby digits or an adjacent month name.Source: E MONTHS: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 23
  • Leading-mode Fourier-plane purities are 0.99 and 0.86 for the k=1 pair, and 0.92 and 0.88 for the k=2 pair.Purity is the energy in the Fourier plane capturing the most energy; a random unit direction has expected purity about 0.17.Source: E MONTHS: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 23
  • 0.96 per-month cosine (median 0.97) aligns the first principal components with theoretical predictions, versus shuffled-label mean 0.35 (95% 0.53).The shuffle null uses 500 label shuffles.Source: E MONTHS: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 23

F MUSIC: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

The music experiments test transposition/inversion symmetry against chord co-occurrence and embedding data, finding that T/I captures much of the statistics and predicts the learned geometry. The predicted irrep structure is strongest in leading planes and remains broadly stable across window sizes.

Isotypic energy

  • The top three Bach embedding planes are dominated by irreps E5, E2, and E3, with isotypic energies 0.958, 0.873, and 0.662 versus chance 1/6.The two-dimensional irreps have isotypic dimension four for the T/I action on the 24 triads.Source: Figure 6 · p. 24, F MUSIC: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 25

Accessing quality of statistical hypotheses

  • T/I explains R2 = 0.822 of chord co-occurrence structure, close to transposition-only Z12 at 0.830; none of 2000 random chord relabelings surpasses T/I.More restrictive T/I conjugacy classes score 0.435, suggesting full T/I is the sharpest reliably present symmetry among the tested hypotheses.Source: F MUSIC: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 24

ChordBERT activations

  • ChordBERT layer 3 triad activations are averaged across occurrences, and their first two principal components have high E5 isotypic energy, accompanying a circle-of-fifths pattern.The corpus analysis uses 371 Bach chorales and focuses on the 24 major/minor triads, which account for 78% of chord tokens.Source: F MUSIC: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · pp. 23, 25

Theory vs. Empirical

  • Theory aligns with empirical embeddings at per-chord cosine 0.98 for chorales and 0.91 for ChordBERT, above their respective relabeling-null means of 0.40 and 0.29.Across the first six chorale dimensions, overall cosine similarity is 0.95, with per-plane values 0.98, 0.94, and 0.80; predictive agreement weakens in less prevalent modes.Source: F MUSIC: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 25

Model comparison protocol

  • At 12 chorales, T/I reaches 0.892 held-out cosine similarity, the best model at that training size; RAW needs around 50 chorales to match it.Across random train/test splits, RAW performs best by a small margin, while T/I and Z12 do not do much worse.Source: F MUSIC: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 25, Figure 8 · p. 26

Changing window size for constructing M ⋆

  • Across tested window sizes, fitted rotation angles and isotypic energies remain largely consistent, while eigenvalues drift more because they depend strongly on corpus.Plane 3 changes somewhat, which the authors describe as understandable for weaker data modes.Source: F MUSIC: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 26, Figure 9 · p. 26

G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

The sky experiments estimate sphere-based co-occurrence structure from LLM activations and selected astronomy books, with weighting and alignment procedures that account for nonuniform object sampling. The reported analyses find strongly harmonic structure in five of seven models and identify a selected book corpus whose kernel closely matches the model’s.

G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

  • Object sampling is lightly nonuniform, so estimators use inverse-density weights to counterbalance over- and under-sampled regions of the sphere.Uniform sampling would not require weighted estimators.Source: G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 27
  • For LLMs, the kernel is estimated from the activation Gram matrix as a weighted function of true inter-object cosine, using a Gaussian kernel with h = 0.08.The method also fits a weighted linear decoder from activations to 3D positions and uses its fit quality to select each model’s working layer.Source: G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 28
  • Five of seven models show strongly harmonic structure, Mixtral-8x22B is borderline, and GPT-OSS-120B is an outlier with weak structure by every measure.The table evaluates models using linear-decoding R2, zonal R2, dipole-subspace overlap, and the sequence of harmonic degrees.Source: Table 2 · p. 29
  • Sampled degree-ℓ spherical harmonics are orthonormalized degree by degree, and each mode’s degree is assigned by its largest projection energy.For degrees 1 and 2, chance energies are approximately 0.016 and 0.027, while reported purities of 0.5–0.9 are far above chance; centering makes degree-0 energy zero.Source: G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 29
  • The selected four-book, 131k-token corpus has a kernel correlation of 0.95 with the LLM activation kernel.Books were selected for co-occurrence patterns related to celestial geometry; the selected books contain 39 sufficiently counted objects.Source: G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · pp. 29–30
  • Simpler mention-order and within-window co-occurrence metrics can fail by ignoring window membership or unmentioned close pairs; text8 also fails the selection metric despite its larger size.text8 has D = +0.01 (p = 0.48), whereas the selected books pass the stated location-permutation criterion.Source: G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 30
  • The analysis aligns LLM principal-component subspaces to dipole and quadrupole harmonics, then applies pointwise orthogonal Procrustes alignment; the book corpus uses specified M ⋆ modes directly.LLM dipole alignment uses PCs 1–4 and quadrupole alignment uses PCs 5–12.Source: G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · pp. 30–31
  • The LLM’s measured book-like embedding score sits at the ∼93rd percentile of matched simulations at corpus scale, and the curve reaches the model level between 32× and 64× the selected corpus counts.The authors characterize this range as the LLM’s rough effective corpus size.Source: G SKY: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS · p. 31
Loading 2610.00647v1…