Source-linked AI summary

Ex vivo breach detection using electrical conductivity during robotic pedicle drilling in the spine

Jorge Andrés Pérez Velásquez, François Teyssere, Thibault Chandanson, Quentin Grimal, Brahim Tamadazte

arXiv:2610.01310v1cs.RO

TL;DR

Pedicle drilling is risky without real-time vertebral visualization, and current robotic and navigation systems do not fully prevent breaches. This work adds conductivity sensing and real-time breach detection to robotic drilling; in 51 porcine vertebrae, it achieved a 100% detection rate, with all cases graded A or B.

  • Problem

    Pedicle drilling lacks real-time, in-depth vertebral visualization, while navigation and robotic systems do not fully prevent breaches despite risks to vessels and the spinal cord.

    Source: §1 · pp. 2–3
  • Method

    A robotic drill integrates a bioelectrical conductivity sensor with an adaptive-threshold, dual-alert algorithm that stops drilling before a breach.

    Source: §1 · p. 3
  • Results

    Across 51 porcine vertebrae, continuous monitoring achieved a 100% detection rate, with all cases graded A or B.

    Source: §5 · p. 12
  • Takeaways & Limitations

    Electrical conductivity offers an X-ray-free breach-prevention approach that can complement navigation and reduce intraoperative imaging and radiation exposure.

    Source: §5 · p. 12

    Porcine growth cartilage, especially on pedicle-to-vertebral-body trajectories, may confound detection and cause false positives.

    Source: §4 · p. 12

Abstract

from arXiv · show

Purpose: Pedicle screw placement is technically demanding in scoliosis treatment. High precision is required due to limited visibility, anatomical variability, and the risk of complications. Although robotic systems assist CT-based planning and execution, they still rely on ionizing intraoperative imaging and complex registration. This study proposes robotic pedicle drilling with real-time preventive breach detection using electrical bioimpedance sensing. Methods: We developed a robotic approach combined with a pedicle-drilling tool equipped with a proprioceptive electrical bioimpedance sensor developed by SpineGuard. A real-time detection algorithm was designed to analyze the electrical bioimpedance signal during drilling and identify abrupt changes in conductivity associated with potential breaches towards the spinal canal. The method operates without external devices or sensors. Results: The ex vivo experiments showed that the proposed method prevented breaches in 100 of the 51 drilling cases. These findings demonstrate the system's ability to detect potentially hazardous events during drilling and to stop the procedure before. The ex vivo experiments demonstrated that the proposed method prevented breaches in all 51 drilling cases. Conclusions: This work demonstrates the feasibility of robotic pedicle drilling with electrical bioimpedance sensing for real-time breach prevention. Using only the tool signal, the method eliminates the need for external sensing systems and supports safer pedicle screw placement.

1 Introduction

Pedicle preparation is hazardous because surgeons lack real-time, in-depth vertebral visualization, while navigation and robotic systems do not fully prevent breaches. This study combines robotic drilling with conductivity sensing and a real-time algorithm designed to stop drilling before a breach.

  • Pedicle preparation is hazardous because surgeons lack real-time, in-depth vertebral visualization, particularly when scoliosis makes screw entry points challenging.Source: §1 · p. 2
  • Prior approaches include patient-specific guides and nonvisual sensors, while robotic systems commonly use stereotactic navigation, including SpineAssist, ROSA Spine, and ExcelsiusGPS.Source: §1 · pp. 2–3
  • The robotic platform integrates a clinically used SpineGuard bioelectrical conductivity sensor, called DSG, with a motorized drilling system.Source: §1 · p. 3
  • Navigation and robotic systems face usability, cost, accuracy, and registration-error limits, and trajectory planning alone does not fully prevent breaches.Source: §1 · p. 3
  • An adaptive-threshold, dual-alert conductivity algorithm stopped drilling before breaches in all 51 ex vivo trials.Source: §1 · p. 3
  • The mean error remained within [-1, +1.4] mm, and 100% of drillings were graded A or B.Source: §1 · p. 4

2 Materials and Methods

The methods pair a tissue-sensitive drill signal with an adaptive breach detector and evaluate the system in prepared porcine vertebrae using mechanical, visual, and imaging checks.

2.1 Experimental Setup

  • Tissue-dependent conductivity differences and signal changes near cortical micro-fractures provide cues for detecting lateral or medial breaches before the drill fully enters the spinal canal.Conductivity is lowest in cortical bone, higher in cancellous bone, and highest in blood and soft tissue.Source: §2.1 · pp. 4–5

2.2 Drilling Workflow

  • The workflow used fresh pig vertebrae immersed in saline with approximately 120–130 mmol/L NaCl to mimic the ionic environment of cerebrospinal fluid.The solution was selected to reproduce CSF conductivity, particularly its sodium and chloride composition.Source: §2.2 · p. 5

2.3 Vertebrae Collection and Preparation

  • Fresh pig vertebrae were drilled toward the spinal canal along a trajectory that avoided growth cartilage, with drilling performed at 10 N and 30 rpm.The vertebrae were clamped for continuous camera inspection; a surgeon created the entry point and hand-guided the robot into position.Source: §2.3 · pp. 5–6

2.4 Methodology

  • Breach results were checked by ball-tip palpation, post-drilling visual inspection of the spinal canal, and CT scans combined with video analysis.These checks were used to assess cortical integrity and confirm the absence of false positives and false negatives.Source: §2.4 · p. 6

2.5 Breach Detection Algorithm and Dataset

  • Offline tuning moved the measurement window to begin at 2 mm and allowed alerts from 3 mm because breaches in thinner pedicles could precede the original 5 mm window endpoint.The adaptive reference is based on initial drilling measurements, with upper and lower bounds intended to limit false negatives and false positives, respectively.Source: §2.5 · pp. 6–7
  • The detector uses conductivity and drilling depth to identify changes associated with transitions from bone to fluid-filled regions, then triggers an alert when either of two criteria is met.One criterion compares current conductivity with an adaptive threshold; the other detects a conductivity variation above a calibrated 230 mV gradient threshold within the search window.Source: §2.5 · pp. 7–8

3 Results

The conductivity-based detector stopped drilling before perforation in all 51 fresh pig vertebrae, with placements classified as A or B. Conductivity peaks marked micro-breach onset, while measured stopping errors remained within the reported range.

3 Results

  • The surgeon manually positioned the drill at the pedicle entry point before automatic drilling, generally using 10 N of force and up to 100 N as needed.Force and rotational speed were adjusted according to vertebral bone quality.Source: §3 · p. 8
  • All 51 drillings stopped immediately before perforation, with 6 grade A and 45 grade B outcomes and none near the 2 mm grade C threshold.The vertebrae were fresh lumbar pig specimens; grade A and B placements are deemed clinically acceptable.Source: §3 · p. 9
  • A sharp conductivity peak marked cortical micro-breach onset across cases, after which drilling stopped.Conductivity decreased on entering less-conductive cortical bone in the described example.Source: §3 · p. 9
  • Stopping errors averaged 0.7 mm (SD 0.45 mm) and ranged from –0.9 mm to +1.4 mm.The error measure was canal deformation length, with positive values indicating deformation and negative values indicating stopping before deformation.Source: §3 · p. 9

4 Discussions

Following an initial evaluation on lamb vertebrae, the system was tested in pig pedicles under more clinically representative conditions. The discussion notes that growth cartilage may complicate detection on some trajectories.

4 Discussions

  • The earlier lamb-vertebrae evaluation used favorable, vertical spinous-process trajectories to test robot controls, drill-bit design, and conductivity signal quality.The initial algorithm was also evaluated in those experiments.Source: §4 · pp. 9, 11
  • Figures 5–8 document conductivity and detection timing, canal-boundary deformation, before-and-after canal appearance, and deformation distances from the canal.Figure 8 identifies 0.5–1 mm as the most frequent deformation range.Source: Figure 5 · p. 10, Figure 6 · p. 11, Figure 7 · p. 11
  • The later evaluation drilled fresh pig pedicles along trajectories toward the spinal canal, excluding clinically unacceptable deviations to isolate breach detection.The discussion describes pig vertebral morphology as similar to humans.Source: §4 · pp. 11–12
  • Growth cartilage in porcine specimens may confound detection through higher conductivity and false positives, particularly on pedicle-to-vertebral-body trajectories.The discussion proposes characterizing its conductivity for the decision logic or using mature specimens without growth cartilage.Source: §4 · p. 12

5 Conclusions

The study concludes that real-time electrical-conductivity monitoring can stop drilling before spinal-canal perforation. The authors describe it as an X-ray-free approach that could be integrated into surgical tools, with further research supporting deployment across autonomy levels.

5 Conclusions

  • Across 51 porcine vertebrae, continuous conductivity monitoring stopped drilling before spinal-canal perforation, with a 100% detection rate and all cases graded A or B.The conclusion describes the approach as an automatic breach-detection algorithm based on real-time electrical conductivity measurements.Source: §5 · p. 12
  • Electrical conductivity offers an X-ray-free approach that can complement navigation, reduce intraoperative imaging, and limit radiation exposure.Source: §5 · p. 12
  • The online detection method could be integrated into standalone surgical tools or added as a safety feature to existing drilling systems.Source: §5 · p. 12
  • Further research may support more advanced detection and deployment from assisted manual through semi-autonomous drilling to fully autonomous systems.Source: §5 · pp. 12–13
Loading 2610.01310v1…