Source-linked AI summary
Focusing Efficiency for Large Intelligent Surfaces
Jiawang Li, Alireza Saberkari, Buon Kiong Lau, Mats Gustafsson
TL;DR
Near-field focusing can improve WPT efficiency for devices in the near field of large LIS deployments. The paper derives optimal LIS currents under a total-power constraint and finds that focusing efficiency varies with receiver type, orientation, and distance, while full-wave FEKO results agree with the theoretical predictions.
Problem
Many devices in large-scale LIS deployments lie in the near field, where focusing can provide substantially higher transfer efficiency than conventional far-field WPT.
Source: §I · p. 1Method
The paper derives the optimal LIS current distribution under a total-power constraint for arbitrary receiving antenna patterns and validates its theoretical predictions with full-wave FEKO simulations.
Source: §I · p. 1, §III · p. 5Results
Focusing efficiency depends on receiver type, orientation, and distance; all four considered antennas average approximately 2% when orientations are uniformly distributed over the sphere.
Source: §III · p. 5, IHZ I · p. 5Takeaways & Limitations
Receiver design should consider orientation sensitivity as well as maximum achievable efficiency, and the framework provides a basis for efficient single-user LIS-enabled WPT design.
Source: §I · p. 1, IHZ I · p. 4
Abstract
from arXiv · showhide
This paper studies wireless power transmission (WPT) with large intelligent surfaces (LISs) in a single-user scenario, with emphasis on power-transfer efficiency. The optimal current distribution on the LIS is derived under a total-power constraint for an arbitrary receiving antenna, providing a theoretical characterization of the maximum achievable focusing efficiency. The analysis shows that the efficiency is strongly affected by the receiving radiation pattern, antenna orientation, and transmission distance. Clear performance differences are observed among practical antenna types for specific orientations, whereas directional averaging makes their average focusing efficiencies much closer. The theoretical findings are further validated by full-wave FEKO simulations, showing good agreement with the predictions of the proposed formulation. These results provide insight into the impact of receiver characteristics and propagation geometry on LIS-enabled WPT and offer a theoretical basis for efficient single-user power-transfer design.
I. INTRODUCTION
Near-field focusing is relevant to LIS-enabled WPT because many devices in large-scale deployments lie in the near field, where focusing can improve efficiency over conventional far-field WPT. This paper derives optimal LIS currents for arbitrary receiver patterns and studies how receiver and propagation characteristics affect efficiency.
I. INTRODUCTION
- In large-scale LIS deployments, many devices are in the near field, where focusing can provide substantially higher transfer efficiency than conventional far-field WPT.WPT is presented as an application that can reduce battery dependence for low-power IoT devices.Source: §I · p. 1
- Prior work derived optimal aperture excitations and efficiency bounds, while later simulations and experiments reported efficiency improvements for near-field WPT.Reported examples include a 30% improvement in implantable WPT and 72% beam collection efficiency with a 256-element prototype.Source: §I · p. 1
- The paper derives optimal LIS currents under a total-power constraint for arbitrary receiving antenna patterns and examines antenna pattern, orientation, and transmission distance.The theoretical results are validated with full-wave FEKO simulations.Source: §I · p. 1
- The framework is intended to provide a general basis for efficient single-user LIS-enabled WPT design.Source: §I · p. 1
II. MODELLING AND ERROR FORMULATION
The model treats the LIS as a continuous aperture and the compact receiver through its radiation pattern, despite the receiver lying in the LIS near field. It formulates received-power maximization under a total-power constraint and examines practical effects of conductor loss on the optimized excitation.
II. MODELLING AND ERROR FORMULATION
- Because the receiver is much smaller than its separation from the LIS, its incident field is locally approximated as far-field excitation while the LIS remains a continuous radiating aperture.The formulation accommodates arbitrary receiver patterns; only electric surface current is considered on the LIS.Source: §II · p. 1
- As conductor loss increases, rapidly varying, spatially irregular optimal currents are suppressed, making the distributions smoother and more practical to implement.The lossless or weakly lossy solution is an upper-bound reference; with increasing loss, the optimum approaches time-reversal excitation, while direct optimization can be more efficient under low-loss conditions but harder to realize.Source: §II · p. 2
- The optimization maximizes received power under a total-power constraint, and focusing efficiency is received RF power before rectification divided by total LIS radiated power.Source: §II · pp. 1–2
IHZ I
The section formulates efficiency-maximizing LIS currents and evaluates how receiver type, orientation, and distance shape focusing efficiency. It also uses spherical-wave reconstruction to assess arbitrary orientations and compares orientation-averaged performance.
IHZ I
- The framework maximizes WPT efficiency under a total-power constraint and solves the current problem using MoM with RWG basis functions.The implementation uses at least 10 elements per wavelength and accounts for bidirectional LIS radiation by multiplying the calculated efficiency by 2.Source: IHZ I · p. 3
- ηfocus decreases monotonically with distance, and FEKO results for a λ/2 dipole agree well with the theoretical curves.The agreement is reported for a 4λ × 4λ planar LIS aperture.Source: IHZ I · p. 3
- For a λ/2 dipole, ηfocus is about 3.5% at an aperture-to-distance ratio of 0.5 and about 1% at 0.25.At very large ratios, the LIS approaches half-space coverage and can collect up to half the dipole's radiated power, consistent with reciprocity.Source: IHZ I · pp. 3–4
- The patch has the highest ηfocus throughout the investigated distances, while the PIFA, dipole, and monopole are lower and relatively similar at larger distances.The comparison covers a probe-fed patch, PIFA, meander dipole, and folded L-shaped monopole, with antenna normals directed toward the LIS.Source: IHZ I · p. 4
- The patch has the highest peak ηfocus at 0°, but is most orientation-sensitive, falling below 1% at certain polar angles before recovering at larger angles; the monopole varies more moderately than the dipole.The PIFA shows high efficiency at small angles, pronounced degradation at intermediate angles, and subsequent recovery.Source: IHZ I · p. 4
- Spherical-wave expansion coefficients reconstruct the antenna field at arbitrary observation points, and a coordinate transformation evaluates rotated fields without additional full-wave simulations.The rotation matrix maps the antenna body coordinates to global coordinates; the same expansion coefficients can be reused for different orientations.Source: IHZ I · p. 4
- Uniformly sampled orientations yield approximately 2% average ηfocus for all four antennas, with the far-field estimate of 0.0199 close to that result.After directional averaging, the remaining contribution depends on the solid angle subtended by the receiving surface; the estimate uses A = 16λ² and η ≈ A/(4πd²).Source: IHZ I · p. 5
III. CONCLUSION
The paper derives an LIS current distribution that maximizes received power under a total-power constraint for arbitrary receiving antenna patterns. It characterizes focusing efficiency across receiver configurations and reports agreement between numerical results and full-wave FEKO simulations.
- The framework finds the LIS current distribution that maximizes received power under a total-power constraint for an arbitrary receiving antenna pattern.Source: §III · p. 5
- The resulting power-transfer efficiency is characterized across different receiver configurations.Source: §III · p. 5
- Numerical results and full-wave FEKO simulations confirm the theoretical predictions and demonstrate effects of receiver type, orientation, and transmission distance on focusing efficiency.Source: §III · p. 5